Did you spot the glaring error through my failure to proof read?

My point 4 of the way to achieve breakeven. Sales from the bars should not have been exceeded by purchases.

Whenever did any businessman worth his salt pay say a £1.50 for the price of a pint from his wholesaler and sell it for £1.25.
Incidently the Bullsbar was selling beer at £1.20 a half and £2.80 a pint I am told.Surely a half should have cost £1.40?

I have seen accounts.
I make this up not.

Lunatic Ok.

Sadly in your case I believe that's true. I presume you stream of consciousness style is you doing your best, but it really doesn't add to clarity





FFS within 10 seconds of RW name ever being mentioned details of his preious ventures were published on this forum, yet here we are, a century later, with you thinking youve got another scoop




It's "en bloc" (French) and OK was the only shareholder. How does one person resign en bloc?


Which bit? You say a million things in each poem sorry post


Oh, I might just have the odd one.

You do know it was OK who insisted on a creditors meeting, don't you?

It does, though it was no secret. It was the money from those days that OK spent that forms part of his "loan account". The reason I presume the administrator doesn't seem to have the figures would probably be because he never asked for them.

Haven't heard that one .. do tell.

Can I remind all posters that any libellous or potentially libellous posts will be removed. Rlfans doesn't have the money to fight legal battles. Posters have been sued in the past I kid you not.

You've been warned.

Has anyone but N&H & FA actually read the last 3 posts?

Don't worry, I know a solicitor with loads & loads of free time on his hands.

You "mean the one that does "pro bono" as part of a Sonny & Cher tribute act??

I thought it was a U2 act?

Flaming cheapskates......get a proper solicitor to post a proper solicitor's letter..

Rival relegation threatened club chairman doesnt want us to get points back as it would potentially hurt his club so he goes public to put some pr pressure on the rfl panel with a threat to throw his teddy out of the pram.....what a shocker.

only thing that lets him down really, if you agree with his sentiments or not (and I have some sympathy with him tbf), is this line;

" I would probably do the same thing " - M Carter.


Really? so what are you bleating to the press about then? stfu.

He needs to be careful - if the RFL actually do an audit covering the SL era, they may well decide to choose which club has done most for the game over that period.

Does Carter actually understand what has happened at Bradford? I am baffled by the story.



The implication is that if the debts were particularly great, then they would or could do it, to escape the debts. But surely the key point he is missing is that here we have a completely different and genuinely unconnected new owner. It is NOT a case of the existing owners, or some flavour or variant or associated company or entity, effecting some legal swerve.

It isn't whether or not there is anything to stop them going into administration, it's whether he would lose the club and everything, as Khan did, and it be bought from an administrator by some new owner, as Green did, with Carter no longer any part of the new business, and no involvement save counting his losses. Is that "getting away with" something? If so, what?


Omar Khan has not "got away with" anything. He's done his financial bollox in. The new owners would only get points back on the basis of the current rules and procedures to which you, and all owners, are subject.

Right. I know that legally, both administrations are completely separate events.

But when Mr Wilson wrote that a reduction in central funding (last minute take it or leave it demand to get us out of first administration) was one of 4 main reasons that the second administration happened, he was saying that the consequences of the first administration had a direct bearing on the second.

I would also think that the meeting which OK agreed to sell his shares but whoever was at the meeting forgot to get a binding agreement down would have an impact on the second administration.

Then the "accounting irregularities" would have a bearing.

These are not standard events in an administration. OKbulls managed to have all 3. And probably more we're unaware of.

Are these the kind of strands that we'll be trying to pull together for our appeal?