thats a fair point. Is it written down in rules that he had to qualify for france before feb 2008 cutoff? or is that just your understanding of the rule?. Not that im doubting you RER just want to know why you think rule works that way.

Widdop can't be classed as overseas i dont think. I was playing against him until about 14/15. He was at Kings Cross

I really hope Flannery isn't Menzies' replacement, not in the same class.

but he does get through a lot of work and maybe the cheaper option
the money saved on having flannery could be used to sign a real quality back

Know any English quality backs out of contract? The only reason we should let Menzies go is to get a quality back from the NRL, if we use his quota spot on Flannery i'll be very, very disappointed.

i wouldnt be ver yvery dissapointed
a little angry that the spot hasnt been used "properley" but i wouldnt be too fussed with signing flannery
i was very excited when he signed for saints

lets get jamie soward
we must have a little bit of money from sam
him and orford would set the world alight


well that was a ice thought
lets get back to reality

Either you're winding people up, or you've been living under some sort of rock.

Isn't that were trolls normally hang out.

But Flannery is a quota player, signing Flannery would take up the only quota spot we have available and thus would prevent us from signing either a quality stand off/centre or straight replacement for Menzies, as the only players of sufficant standard in these areas to compensate for Beavers loss will require a quota spot.

wel it aint gonna prevent us from signing a stand off / fb
it just not going to be someone from oz/nz

And how many quality English stand-offs are there that are a) out of contract and/or b) willing to come to Bradford??


Hopefully rumours about Leon could be true, but I can't see it!

Flannery wouldn't be a good use of our last quota spot imo, when we could keep somebody in that position but who is a better player.