But it isn't is it? The RFL clearly stated one of the reasons for not accepting the financial bid & forecast was because there was no investment funding going forward.

Moore & then Whitcut both failed to detail what their plans were, but both chose to blame the RFL. That's afar wasier than actually talking figures and admitting they had no money to invest.

The same people signed on as directors at OK Bulls and had allegedly agreed to purchase the shares of OK Bulls from Khan. They then found, miraculously, financial transactions that one of the directors who had been running OK Bulls knew nothing about?

I think wh\t you'll find is Khan left Whitcut with the job of off loading the business asap. He almost pulled it off, but when the irregularities came to light they backed off. Khan realising his plan had been rumbled played the victim and said he was going to take legal action. He never did and hasn't.

The big difference you don't seem to understand is that the RFL were able to step in to vet purchasers pland once the business was in admin.

Prior to admin the only test was fit and proper as it would be the only influence they could have.

Oops! You LIED again

For the avoidance of doubt, Moore told me and others personally some months ago that Khan had instigated a legal action against him and Whitcu*t over failure to proceed with the share purchase.

But he clearly must have been lying, since LiarDweeb assures us - categorically and unequivocally - that no such action was ever initiated.

The deal was agreed based on false information supplied via Whitcut who was still working for Khan.. Once the deception was rumbled, the buyers back ed out & reverted to their original plan.. BB2014 was set up to take over once OK Bulls failed, which it did.

You have said previously there were no details of cases publicly available. Now you are quoting case numbers and courts. Curiously you aren't linking to any court sites where these details can be verified.

YOU are the perpetual liar and troll.

You didn't get sight of any documents? Which solicitor was apparently acting for Khan?

He can't take any more, LiarDweeb has left the building!

Oh grow up. Can you prove that NO action is taking place?

I presume you DO know that FA is a Lawyer? And has been for many years? You?

There are public lists, they pin them up each day on the court notice board.

Tell me though, which bit of

is it that you are struggling with?

Why are you suddenly not so cocksure that there is no case?

And are you going to apologise to me for calling me a liar, and to the forum for spouting bollox claiming it to be fact?

be careful. Are you again accusing me of lying? You want more humiliation?

Here is an excerpt from the T&A report

So you didn't get sight of any documents? Just like you said you voluntarily signed an NDA but couldn't confirm the capacity in which you allegedly saw financial information....

Leeds high Court?
Which solitcitor is acting for Khan?
The alleged case number you have a suggested is genuine relates to which parties, i.e who are the named parties in the alleged case?