Have Hull even signed him yet anyway? Agar is saying they haven't.

Probably just keeping quiet until everything is signed and sealed, visa confirmed etc.

He might even struggle to get a visa, he's been sacked by 2 clubs for drink related incidents.

it would depend on how clean his criminal record is.

hasnt got one afaik. the incidents he was sacked for were for breaches of club discipline so shouldnt be of any concern to immigration authorities.

Id still rather have Leon Pryce.

Looks like Seymour has signed for Hull tvnz.co.nz/rugby-league-news/sey ... rs-4254344

Looks like Seymour has signed for Hull tvnz.co.nz/rugby-league-news/sey ... rs-4254344

The obvious difference would therefore be that we (after recent events with contracts) didn't want to offer more than 2yrs. Hull offered 3 but at slightly less annual salary so therefore can factually be reported that he signed for Hull for less money.

No, he just preferred Hull to Bradford.

I'm sure you're trolling but I'm going to bite anyway because there does appear to be some deluded hull fans that genuinely believe professional rugby players, in their short careers that can be cut short at any time, don't care about job security etc. they're just happy to take a pay cut to play for a slightly better club in a comp that's far bellow the standard their used to. Sounding more and more like Wire fans.

Thanks for your opinion on that. To upgrade to something with a bit more weight - you either need to say

1) I have spoken to Peter Hood, George Mimis & Seymour and they have kindly given me a copy of Bradford's offer which I can PDF to anyone who wants confirmation.

or

2) No, he just preferred Hull to Bradford - FACT (which has been the standard option from your neck of the woods for the last 9days.

Ok - from the players own lips - "Brett Seymour has confirmed he's leaving the Warriors at the end of the season.

The halfback has agreed to terms on a three-year contract with UK Super League club Hull FC.

Seymour said the deal gives him financial security.

He said the contract will give him an opportunity to travel the world while he plays"

Security in player/ agent terms means length of contract.

Whilst I have seen neither offer, from the statement I would conclude that he chose the one with the longer term. I can't stick FACT after it as I don't know for sure but that is the conclusion I would make.

Nobody will know wht he signed, but at the moment I think most players would choose Hull over Bradford.

Choose Britain's worst city over its second worst?

Hull - the place that gives Bradford hope.