I'm just waiting to see what deal we get when we tell the RFL we aren't paying full rent for the ground when we are in the Championship.

Let's play at VP next year, might save a few quid?

BB2014 was set up because Moore & Co had no intention of buying OK Bulls. In just the same way as OK Bulls was set up with Khan having no intention of buying BB Holdings.

Easiest way to start debt free.

There is and never was a legal case being pursued by Omar Khan for his shares not being purchased. Why do you keep perpetuating this outright lie? You'd have to ask Moore what Whitcut didn't tell him. The administrators statement of proposals clearly references this.

BB2014 was not accepted by the RFL because no agreement was reached on a sale. BB2014 business plans were negotiated with and rejected by the RFL.

Once these plans were rejected and BB2014 informed, a points deduction was handed down. BB2014 didn't walk away because of the points deduction. They walked away because they didn't have any money to invest.

Even just as a set of words thats nonsense. Not even judging it in relation to reality but on its merits as prose its just fsking nonsense.

Of all the lies you have put forward over the past few weeks (seems like years), this is the funniest.

So lets get this right, BB2014 (Moore, Calvert, RHP and Watt) were told by the RFL that they would not accept their bid, yet this is the first that anyone has EVER heard of this.

So the statements from the Board (at the time) about not accepting to be placed into 'special measures' (due to them being respectful business men apparently) was just a smokescreen as the RFL had actually told them that they could not own the club, so they all lied so that the truth could be kept from everyone for no apparent reason?

Wow - I think you have just outdone yourself! I'm impressed (and not is a good way!)

Also, I must have imagined of the meeting between the RFL, OK and the members of BB2014 in December, in which they agreed the sale price of the club (to only find that OK changed the details at a later date). I must have some imagination!

It is similar to how if he likes a poster he always has to try and convince us of their right to be heard.

It is like the Court of King Characterless.

Shall we stop falling out on this subject and concentrate on the Leeds board.They have already got 2 topics titled "Robbed"

If that's all we've got at the moment to make us feel better I'll take that right now

All this in fighting isn't very edifying is it?

You're all grown men aren't you?

Let's give it a rest please.

Mr. Moderator, can I just point out that I am (once again) complying with what the moderators have requested. The personal attacks are totally one-sided, and getting more than a bit irritating now.

(Edited as per Feeble's advice below.)

Might help your case if you didn't refer to mods by their first names, Adey. Makes nutty Eddie's accusations sound more plausible and its a little funny how you've suddenly started doing it.

?? I've always done it with Sam, from time to time, nothing new there. As I have with our friend Craig too, from time to time. I guess since I use my own first name on here, the thought never entered my head about what you suggest. Don't really see anyway why I should have to make "my case", though. House divided...all very sad.

So, when a deal was signed to buy OK's shares, how was it negotiated and agreed? Accidentally? It is an odd thing, that. To agree to buy someone's shares for £300K when you have no intention of doing so. Perhaps you could explain how that one works?


One of us is a perpetual liar, and as I have said, it isn't me. This particular mistake of yours, which you keep repeating, PROVES you to be a liar. Why? Because you don't say you simply "don't know of" any case, or that you've not heard of the case. You bluster that "THERE IS AND NEVER WAS" a case. And accuse me of perpetuating "a lie". No room for doubt, then. You are telling the forum that YOU KNOW, and therefore you know I "am lying".

So let me tell you the case details. It is - and has for very many weeks - been proceeding in the High Court at Leeds under case number A30LS219. In fact, oddly enough, OK started these legal proceedings at the time that he publicly announced in the local press that he had started these proceedings.

You have been a busted flush for a while, but your gamble on your wild guess that there was no case has failed, and you are a now proven LIAR. Well done you!


The remainder of your lies, like the above, can therefore be safely ignored as the invented product of your febrile imagination.

But it isn't is it? The RFL clearly stated one of the reasons for not accepting the financial bid & forecast was because there was no investment funding going forward.

Moore & then Whitcut both failed to detail what their plans were, but both chose to blame the RFL. That's afar wasier than actually talking figures and admitting they had no money to invest.

The same people signed on as directors at OK Bulls and had allegedly agreed to purchase the shares of OK Bulls from Khan. They then found, miraculously, financial transactions that one of the directors who had been running OK Bulls knew nothing about?

I think wh\t you'll find is Khan left Whitcut with the job of off loading the business asap. He almost pulled it off, but when the irregularities came to light they backed off. Khan realising his plan had been rumbled played the victim and said he was going to take legal action. He never did and hasn't.

The big difference you don't seem to understand is that the RFL were able to step in to vet purchasers pland once the business was in admin.

Prior to admin the only test was fit and proper as it would be the only influence they could have.

Oops! You LIED again