Thanks for the response bowlingboy. True, you are not being overly negative. To be fair, your first three points on the list are history therefore cannot be considered continued poor running. So the rest of your points:

Poor communication. was it ever thus? When it is going well, it is easy to communicate good news, indeed nothing, repeat nothing easier, you are surfing on the top of an overwhelming good-news sunami breaking wave. Same for when it is sort of going well but there nonetheless are concerns, although Chris's diatribe about not enough fans coughing up the readies is a case in counter-point. And we were supposedly doing well then. So when you start with nothing, have half your key players injured and the star you sign crocked after 60 minutes, yes that is difficult communication time. And please show me examples of clubs that announce they are going to lose the next game because they only have kids and make-squad-weights (hyphenation courtesy of FA) to play? If I am sounding a bit too critical I apologise, these are genuine questions, how would you do the PR in such a situation? Because if you have an answer, you have a job for life and not with the Bulls, with the best PR company in the world.

Damaging poor press releases. My take on this is what damage has been done other than to the blood pressure levels of a few OCD's on this forum? Are we bottom of championship 1 because of these PR's? Whether we like it or not, and note my T'witter name for Witter, social media is the future, not the past that this forum so clearly represents. With however apologies to a number of younger posters (eg BB11) who put up with this forum's old farts. So our media warrior with a spelling but not a grammar checker is fully the future, and no doubt inspiring those social media idiots to part with their pennies, unlike the old-life on this forum.

Not having a coach lined up. See my numerous previous posts essentially along the line of do we need to be practising our plays in October when first of all the team need to get fit courtesy of the new fitness team and then get the basics right such as catch a ball and make a tackle which is pretty generic training these days. Head coach teaching the U16's how to do a leg curl or squat? And Cha should have plan B, confirmed in the media that the current coaching team would supervise the first part of the preseason. Also Chalo have given the appointment timetable, which allows the new coach a couple of weeks with the squad and then assess their actual performance in a friendly a couple of months before the first competitive game.

Not having the coach selecting their own squad. Any organisation is run from the top, not the middle. Any good coach can take any squad and mould it to the top's requirements, and feed back to the top the failings of their choices, if they did not already know them but budget constraints dictated. Green did not know what it was all about, so could not provide that leadership (nor could his side-kicks but more of that later). Cha seems a bit more savvy, and will impose on the coach of his choice the squad of his, and Tooveys and etc etc etc choice.

Inviting Rimmed was sensible. From the horses mouth, Championship 1. Saves a lot of speculation and wasted hope. if I could have been there I would have taken the foulest smelling eggs to decorate him with for a wasted year purely for their convenience. Maybe if he gets invited again we will all know what to do.

Crash at Salford. more of a question of KC deciding he was not a sugar daddy, so our CEO or whatever was more a victim than a cause of the crash. where did Salford get to in superleague last season compared to us?

the other you refer to I presume is Duffy. He has been involved in spectacular success and failure in the past. Which indicates to me that it was those at the top not Duffy that caused the success or failure, per my previous comments that an organisation is lead from the top.

Making date announcements. I do not know the specifics, if you are up to it after this marathon please advise. All I can say in the meantime is that happens whatever the intentions. So credit to Cha for at least announcing the dates, how many owners would do that? But black marks for not acknowledging the dates have not been met, you do not have to give detailed reasons in such a situation.

My take on this admin is they have performed unseen and therefore unacknowledged miracles to get this far from their starting position, and all venom should be directed at the RFL for that starting position. But without counting chickens before they are hatched as can happen, if we are still around in five years time we may see last season as a turning point in the way the club is managed. Not by no-experience no-hopers, but by owners steeped in RL experience, and I suspect, a secret sugar daddy. The accounts when eventually released may shed some light on the last point, so I will update when they are available.

And that is it until we have a new coach and a few more of the balance of the squad in place,

FA can you quote-reply to this please so I can achieve my ambition of a full - page post from you, it is a very small handicap I have gifted you...

My pleasure!



Very polite.



Indeed, he isn't.


Indeed.

Love it

Far too many words for it to be him. I have Chalmers down as a "lurker" on here only

While Duffy and RHP are stealing salaries we are running in treacle, we need professional competent people in all positions from playing staff through to the chairmen, and imho these two have been involved to much in past failure to warrant a place at the top table.

On Rimmed it was a phone based typo, however Ralph Rimmed is what he shall be known as in my mind from now on!

Who says Frank is Stuart Duffy on here? Nobody has ever shown me any proof.

Mmm, Errol Stock says Frank Whitcombe isn't who he says he is.....Well, I can see the funny side to that if no-one else can!

Trouble with soshul meeja is that if he was ever that unwise, he'd be trolled to extinction.

Unless somebody ever manages to invent a way of stopping every thread ever, rapidly descending into a puerile slanging match. Unless somebody has a worldwide supply of Rohypnol, and a means of compulsorily administering it prior to anyone accessing any form of social media, interacting in a professional manner ain't never gonna happen.

The world of social media is largely inhabited by the sort of twunts who used to only be able to troll radio phone ins, but who now regale the comments sections of newspapers and similar repositories of professional interaction, and revel in being able to direct bile straight to any possible target.

I'm neither convinced he is or convinced he isn't. However every single Bulls forum I've seen over the years (and I've seen a few of them) has always had Duffy there somewhere posting away. Whenever he's been "found out", he tends to change names. If he's not Frank, I would put bloody good money on him being someone else on here. Maybe he's me. I'm off to look in the mirror to check.

He's really Mystic Eddie all that Duffy hate is just a distraction!

I doubt that Frank is Stuart Duffy's account. Anyone that remembers the official Bulls messageboard of yesteryear will remember Stuart's posting style. It's very "un-Frank" like.

I tend to agree. I've spotted his style in other accounts before, but it never flagged on Frank. In fact, had it not been mentioned by a couple of posters, I don't think I'd have got to that conclusion myself on this one.

I AM STUARTACUS