Walker Morris Solicitors is owned by Walker Morris Resources Ltd, of which he was a director until 13 July this year, so ok slight correction. Just wondering if he was freeing up time for whatever.

Does that mean he's no longer a 'Senior Partner' in the firm then?

I don't know how old he is but I'd have guessed he was at least as old as me so might be looking to retirement. I'll include the unreserved apology in the original post just to save time, in case he feels that is an unwarranted slur and defamatory..

Was at the Avenue game at Harrogate yesterday and can confirm the rumour about the BPA bid,A brewery IS involved in the bid

Is it? How does that work? Why does their website not mention any such company?

Walker Morris Resources Ltd
Trading as: Walker Morris Solicitors
Address:
KINGS COURT, 12 KING STREET
LEEDS
WEST YORKSHIRE
LS1 2HL

Business: Solicitors

Legal Information

Company Registration No.: 02893065

Incorporation Date: 31 Jan 1994
18 Years old

Financial Year End: 30 Apr

Capital:£1.00
on 25 Jan 12

Company Accounts
For period ending:
30 Apr 11
Filed on:
07 Dec 11

Christopher Stuart Caisley was def born 1951

Now a director (and as far as I can see the only director) of:

CSC CONSULTANTS LIMITED

Appointment Date: 19/01/2012
Position: Director
Occupation: Director
Company Status: Active


Address:
39-43 BRIDGE STREET
SWINTON
MEXBOROUGH
S64 8AP
GB

Further:

The above address is also that of Brearley and Co, Accountants

Hmmmm

Given all the additional free time that Christopher Stuart Caisley seems to have at his disposal, perhaps he would spend a couple of minutes telling us what exactly he hoped/intended to achieve by making his statement about the then Board in April ...... and not saying a word since.

RL Express reports that they believe Khan / Sutcliffe bid is favoured. They "understand" it involves unconditional offer to buy at £150,000 and will agree to take smaller amounts of Sky money for next 12 months " to pacify ...objections to a club offloading debts then continuing to receive full distribution".
Also says whilst agreement to keep 14 teams, other clubs outside SL will also be able to compete for license

So are they suggesting a newco? Or is the "off-loading" to be done via a CVA?

Sounds a bit like a newco as, so far as I know, no-one else has yet had to drop monies for entering a CVA, though neither have I heard of any objections to any other club's future income in previous cases. If it turns out to be a CVA it will still have to be agreed (if indeed the creditors do agree) so it's far from done and dusted.

CVA not likely as the shares in Oldco would stay where they are now.
New investors would want the shares - Newco would give then that

£150k don't seem a lot, perhaps the lower sky money is to sweeten the RFL who are probably owed 1 years rent already on Odsal by the bulls.....HMRC may still have a say on the final outcome