definatly played his last game for souths....could well head to the uk..was saying today on the team bus coming home from newcastle that its been a pleasure to play for the bunnies... dont think he's got a concrete offer from anyone down under as yet...

He's finisheð

Can't see this happening at all because when he signed his new contract extension he said he wanted to see out the rest of his career at Bradford.

So guess no one has heard anything from the Bradford end ?.

He is probably one of the highest paid players we have so the only way i can see it happening is by getting him off the wage bill and spending that chunk on another young up and coming forward. If we get rid of Lynch and sign Ben Ross then i would be very disappointed. So in my eyes it makes no sense selling him.

Do you think bulls would let lynch go? heard that jamie peacock has signed with bulls don't know if its right or wrong who would you like to see in a bulls shirt next season?

You cannot be the only person on the planet not to know JP was on the wind-up???

Lynch shouldn't go, his stats speak for themselves, he is a work horse and does more than any of the other bulls props put together. It's Langley that should be the dead horse to go- get him to the glue factory his wages do not justify him sitting out for most of the season injured. If bulls want to free up money they need to look at him. I cannot fault lynch's season- he has another year in his legs and I sincerely hope it's in a bulls jersey.

We've undoubtedly seen the best years from Lynch as a player but he is still one of our better forwards. We need in improvement in our pack and I think we might struggle to find a better replacement. However he will be among our top earners and I expect the club would be looking for a fee to replace him which may sway their decision on a player who will be 33 in a few months.

Our recent track record of replacing one of our top players with one of similar or better quality hasn't been great though. If we're paying Lynch over the odds then it may make sense, but if that was the case why would another club be chasing him and Lynch looking for a move? Not convinced by this one.. but we'll see.

So? Does it matter how he achieves it? why does he spend more time on the field than other props? because he is better than them, because he is fitter than them and because he is taking a share of Tom's time as he is a young player being brought on carefully? If people slag of Jamie for being injured so much, they should be praising Andy for not being injured and for shouldering other props work.

Hull fans seem to think Lynch is a done deal, will be a massive loss to us if true. Lynch is quality, problem is he has had to much work to do in a poor Bradford team, which is why most of his errors show up more. Will be very hard to replace as only James Graham has made more meters as a prop.

Like Ainscough was.

Would it surprise anybody though if Peter Hood sold him, given the amount of potential/high quality and valuable playing assets he's sold in recent years?

I mean I wouldnt be bothered if we sold him if we could get a better replacement in.

Just wondering if folks would be surprised if Peter Hood sold him?

Now, you keep rolling that one out when you want to have a go at Peter Hood. But who has he sold who wasn't going to leave for free once their Bradford deal expired?