Funny that cos I was going to say the same about you

Out of the three situations I have to disagree with you on at least two...

The play the ball was incorrect, simple as that. you can't blame the referee if our man has failed to get up and playthe ball correctly. He was looking for a penalty and got caught bluffing.

The high tackle was borderline and I would say you have a point with querying that one.

However, the laying on was right. The tackle had been affected and the player failed to move off the man. I have to say that Ganson was right in saying that it wasn't him that determined the speed that a player rolls away from the tackle.

By the fact that he was looking at the referee rather than getting off him shows that he was deliberately slowing the play down.

The rules don't say tackle the player, hold the player down until the ref shouts held and only then get off him.

If you took your rose tinted glasses off you'd realise that EW is the one in the wrong (no matter how much I hate to admit Ganson had a fairly decent game for a change!!!!)

My reply to King Karl was in reference to him being a blatant troll.

The play of the ball was incorrect and the reason given by Ganson was because he didn't put his foot on the ball. Answer me this, why doesn't he give a penalty then every time a player doesn't touch the ball with his foot?

The high tackle was not borderline at all, he tackled the ball carrying arm as it was clear to see, the commentators reaction said it all.

The referee dictates the speed of the play of the play of the ball, the refereeing is so inconsistent in the super league that the players use the refs calls as to what's 'allowed'. For most of the game Ganson had been consistent but on this occasion he got it wrong, he shouted release and then blew his whistle immediately even though Elliot released the player.

I have already said that his penalties are a problem so there is no rose tinted glasses here, just think he was hard done by on a few decisions.

Eh? In this instance he/she was simply answering a question that had been asked. I fail to see why that warrants a rant????

Wasn't a rant, was quite calm tbh

For the record 'Peoples Champion', I was referring to theme and tone of most of the preceding posts. But I know the level of negativity is pi$$ing a lot of people off on here. Constructive criticism is good but a lot seems to be negative comments for the sake of it.