Sorry.

There is of course nothing to say any alleged behaviour (which is not proved until an admission of guilt or a second test is carried out) began after any player started any contract.

No one knows anything yet but what a player may or may not choose to do in his private life is not down to any club he may be or may have been contracted to play for if that makes sense.

Oh god oh god oh god I have some wickedly sharp Troll things to say. But I'm a mod and I must be good (apart from editing Adey's posts).

Newton is a druggy newton is a druggy nanaanna hu nanaanan hu

As much as did not think Terry Newton did much for us in the last year we should at least give him the benefit of the doubt until we find out what substance he has taken. i Am just thankful he is not still with us.

Grow up.

I agree with the comments about it's not necessarily either club's fault, as if he is found guilty, the blame surely rests solely at his own feet and not that of anyone at Bradford or Wakefield.

However am I the only one getting a little bit miffed that all the photos of him accompanying the articles of him failing the drugs test, show him in a Bradford shirt? He is no longer associated with this club and every negative story about him is doing exactly that (associating him with Bradford Bulls).

Isn't this shining a negative light at our club for no good reason?

Have you got a few pages stuck together?

Hardly a surprise. The overwhelming majority of recent pics they have permission to use are going to be of him in a Bradford shirt.

Yeah I know that. But it's still associating the Bradford club with a highly negative story, that really has nothing at all to do with them.

I appreciate it's not really anything to do with Wakefield either, but he is actually employed by them!

There is a big one on the front page of the Yorks Post in a Wakefield shirt thankfully.

And as an aside, having seen their shirt now, ours really is not so bad...

Another positive!

Surely we will have to see if he is guilty before we can decide that.

What's for certain is that if he is exonerated it will have been very unfair on Wakefield who will have lost the services of a player through no fault of the club or Newtons. I suppose by default this would make him a bad signing.

If he is guilty then it is again a bad signing by default as clearly Wakey or Bradford wouldn't of known at the time of his guilty secret. Unless some on here are suggesting Bradford knew and were keen to get shot which would be a very stupid thing to suggest.

It is your clutching at straws with that one jeez