More to the point, would the new owners not wish to re-negotiate a better deal with anyone else, especially as they are not likely to receive any financial gain from a sponsorship that paid up before the administration?

Depends on how badly they want to screw over any possibility of future relations with the smattering of rugby league potential sponsors that still exist, and that had been prepared to pay us money in the past, I suppose.

I don't imagine there's a huge queue of virgin sponsors at the gate, with chequebooks.

I guess they could sell us some little 'iron on', solid black stickers, for just a few pence....or so!

need to come up with a tacky tagline to put one them. Bullieve 2 maybe

Or I'll Bullieve anything, perhaps?

This a no-brainer question.

Bulls is by far the name associated with the modern game.

I'm well over 40 and still have my lucky Bradford Northern scarf.

The answer is simple;

THE NORTHERN BULLS

Take Bradford out of the title and you immediately attract a wider audience
(Like Radio Leeds did with their unsuccessful and misleading "West Yorkshire Sport"icon_wink.gif

The Northern Bulls title could attract fans from all over the North (that are not yet into RL).

Northern can also be interpreted as Northern Hemisphere - remember how many Bulls players have pulled on an England/Scotland/Ireland/Wales/GB shirt.

It could also open up a marketing opportunity for a Southern Bulls side if some rich southerner wants to pay us ££££'s to use the name.

You heard it here first - Our new brand name is The Northern Bulls

We could open a sister club if it went well, the Southern Jessies

Northern Bulls was the name of a South African RU Club before they became the Blue Bulls and I put the Northern Bulls name forward in a post a few years back but it didn't garner much interest!

Keep it as the Bradford Bulls, it was the only re-branding of the SL era that made any sense.

Indeed ,ER.

Bradford fans were probably the most accepting of all clubs, when all the new names came in with SL so I can't imagine there would be any great clamour for a return to Northern.

Mind, it's not as though there have been no other backwards looking, ultimately self harming and perverse decisions taken this year.

Given Mr Sawrij's desire to keep his Dads memory alive, I'm happy for our name to change to Bradford Leo's or Leo's Bulls

The problem with this though is that I think that it is important that club names highlight the place that they represent more than anything else.

For example, in football up here, when the two bigger Inverness sides (inverness Caledonian and Inverness Thistle) amalgamated there was a dispute over what they were going to be called. The fans of both teams wanted their suffix first in the new name as if to show "prominence" as the city's biggest club. They became Caledonian Thistle FC in the first instance. However, Inverness Council felt that their city was losing exposure without the Inverness name in the title and agreed to financially support the club on the understanding that the city name was re-introduced.

Inverness Caledonian Thistle may well seem like a mouthful but that is the reason for it.

Similarly, over the last twenty years, Orient have re-introduced the "Leyton" prefix and Morton have reverted to the "Greenock" prefix.

St Johnstone FC are from Perth and I know that they have looked at ways at incorporating this in their name. How many people know that Port Vale play in Stoke etc etc.

The bread and butter for any team IMO is to appeal to the local support who have an identity and an affinity with the team. A successful team (not neccessarily a winning team but a top-flight team) can promote the city and attract people to the city too.

Northern Bulls I DO like, but it would have to be Bradford Northern Bulls for me. Trying to attract support from other areas is all fine in theory, but the locals are the ones who are there week-in week-out helping the club out most financially and this should be reflected in the name of the club.

Not too sure about 'Northern Bulls', to be honest, but otherwise, pretty much agree with that. 'Bradford Northern Bulls' is far too much of a mouthful for me - a bit like 'Wakefield Trinity Wildcats' - basically one name too many in the title, which should be as short, snappy and memorable as possible.

There would be a problem with 'Leo's' though. As everyone knows, Leo is a lion, and lions and bulls are a poor mix, they just don't get on!

TBH, the last 5 years have severely damaged the Bulls brand both within the sport and the wider community.

We need a stabilizing period with an owner who can not only ensure the club survives but thrives. There are fans out there who've been jaded by the whole "going out of business saga" that we've been on for the last few years and they need to be assured that these end of season antics are going to be a thing of the past. Lessons need to be learned from our footballing neighbours who, despite being in the third tier of their sport are pulling in home crowds that are outshining some Serie A teams and have one of the biggest home supports outside of the Premier League.

There are things that could be done to make this club great again, and despite his naysayers, Marc Green did help put some of the roots down to make this club great again. It just seems that his reach was not as long as his grasp and we have again fallen and to be honest, I'm not sure that we're getting back up this time.