To be honest, with her being so incredibly unprofessional about this, if we can survive without her money, I'm pleased that she's gone.

[urlhttp://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/sport/10412677.Willey_withdraws_her_involvement_with_Bradford_Bulls/[/url

It'd be interesting to know what was behind all this.

Are irrevocable differences the same as irreconcilable differences, or is it a new type of difference?

Apparently there is now a difference where if each party agrees, it can be revoked and the difference(s) expunged from the record. Alas these differences weren't like that.

I'm going to really miss her arguing with abusive people on the T and A message board.

And so it begins

The T&A should have run a headline like "Willey leaves a mess after withdrawal".

Fnar, fnar....

Is it a coincidence that this story broke on day our management were in London and unable to respond promptly? Doubt it somehow

We certainly don't need negativity behind the scenes at the moment & we'd need a really good reason to turn down investment.

Whats more of a concern to me is the fact she seemed to have a good relationship with the players & the wheels have fallen off on the field recently too.

What she's said on twitter may be unprofessional but indicates that she was driven away and is looking at taking legal advice . She's also indicated its in the publics best interest to know whats happened.

I hope we have a full press release soon because at the moment it's painting the club in a negative light again.

You can respond from anywhere now in todays age.

Wouldn't argue with that for younger generation who are more upto speed with twitter/Facebook etc like miss Willey is, but khan and sutcliffe are a generation behind so maybe not as au-fait?

I would doubt a mp and former government minister is familiar with the modern electric telephone.