That might be the best place to read it for a few people.

Along with 'Framing the Future', 'Overseas player quotas and regulations', 'minimum criteria for acceptance into Super League', 'how not to give benefit of the doubt to the attacking side - confessions of several video referees'...

They gonna have to pay people to read his book and accusing the bulls players is pathetic just trying to take the blame off himself the big $hithead.

I[i may[/i be a [ilittle[/i overweight, but what's [ithat[/i got to do with it??

Huh?

Do you know what 'obtuse' means?


That's just daft. He isn't accusing anyone of anything. He says that both Saints and Bradford players put bets on. He also goes into great detail about his own bet and Gleeson's. They both got bans for it so he can hardly try and shift the blame!

Whooooooooosh......!

I know...methinks he's in for as good 'Varking pretty soon...!

Back on topic...and from the words that have been reported, the little wakner never actually said any Bulls players were "in on it". He said "Bradford". As in...could have been anyone.

My thoughts exactly. Provocative but hardly specific to players ofr the club.

Well pleased that Gleeson only got odds of 10/11.
Makes a mockery of the bleeding hearted bookies who reckon they were rooked. They must have know something was up.

Long always seemed to be under the impression he'd been treated harshly when in reality he and Gleeson should have been banned sine die.

Historic long term bans in Football and Horse Racing.
RFL - a slap on the wrist for naughty boys.
Just about says it all.