Schofield really, really dislikes the Bulls, but luckily his predictions are 99% wrong.

Where did Garry say we were going into admin?

I think its via Forty Twenty..

Some guy called Mark Wilson also raising the issue via the same place - not sure if its was a podcast or not.

Joshua Chapman - the Keighley media person has also latched on to the rumour.

Unfortunately it seems to be gathering pace so I hope Mr Chalmers nips it in the bud.

Will have to listen as only listened to the first part.

Reardging Keighleys media manager think he was responding to some frothing at the mouth angry Bulls fan with the reply "listen to the radio, you may be joining us sooner than you think" so he's just heard what Schofield said and used it as a Comeback to the angry Bulls fan trolling them.

Well if them 3 well respected and well informed journalists have said it, we're doomed!

I might make a rumour up about another club and see if I gain any publicity from it.

Until I hear it from a respected source I'll dismiss it.

I preferred it when Chalmers said naff all.

Don’t forgot guys, this is Bradford after all... don’t you know we have to provide receipts and photographic evidence of each and every time a player is paid, everytime we visit the cash n carry to stock up on bottles of water etc etc until such evidence is provided we can all assume we are on the brink of collapse.

Im all seriousness, it must be exhausting being connected to the club, trying to build and constantly see these rumours.

Yes we may be in trouble if our (alleged) investor walks off. We may also be absolutely fine and looking at being in the best shape in years with a larger central funding this year. The fact is very few people know.

The issue being that the ‘journos’ know the headline all is well isn’t as interesting as danger danger

You only have to look at the accounts on Companies House to know Nigel ain't the backer.

I understand where you're coming from but in THIS instance, considering that the lies can get half way around the world before the truth can get its coat on, I'd prefer a clear, concise and quick rebuttal.

Perhaps he can't rebut it?

I'm not worrying about it.

It was only two minutes ago mischief making sods were alluding to us not paying wages. And I believe that turned out to be a load of balls. Rumours make me uneasy but there's every chance they are utter fiction.

After all, sometimes there IS smoke without fire and it turns out just to be someone having a huge spliff.