That's balls though, isn't it? The problems pre-date Hood. Hood has questions to answer to put it mildly, but I don't see how he has benefited from any of this.

What is Caisley (the majority shareholder?) doing? Is he putting his hand in his pocket?

Fair question. And the obvious one, who replaces Hood? Bennett? Duckett?

Maybe, maybe not. And he should do.

However I don't recall him telling lie after lie after lie during his tenure. I accept he caused some problems that Hood inherited, but the "captain" has not exactly dealt with the situation very well at all now has he?

Wakefield fans reached the same conclusion about Ted Richardson last January.

Unfortunately from the CLUB's perspective, the only way a change of management can come about in the current situation is through the BUSINESS entering Administration.

Yes, there's still time for a benefactor to come forward before the deadline but you need to ask yourselves how good their business acumen really is if they would rather cover all the current liabilities when they could give the CLUB a clean slate if Administrators were appointed.

As I've said on other posts, I don't like seeing the Bulls in this situation but the reality is that there is only one way to give the CLUB the sound footing it needs to have a strong future. As the saying goes "Short term pain for long term gain".

It is a situation that should be forced. The RL should not allow people like Hood to run a club. He is bringing the game into disrepute.

Sadly though, the likely outcome will be that we hold a fans forum, people will go along to have their say and come back fooled by another Churchillian speech by Medley and all will be well.

I'd be happier with Duckett in charge.

I wonder if it's telling that Ryan has been the one in the media. Hood has been conspicous by his absence. Could anything be read into that?

I asked that question yesterday.

Hood either doesn't want to be in the firing line or there may be changes happening.

Not the majority shareholder anymore - he is the chap Adey referred to in his post on page 1 as having been bought out by Hood.

Oh right, OK. Back over to you then Mr Hood.

dont think thats actually correct. if Hood had bought Caisleys shares then he'd hold 30+%. He only has 22%. Think Hood actually bought Colin Tordoffs share holding though im not 100% sure.