Why?

Before the remaining Bulls fans all challenge each other to a duel - there is a high probability this "leaked" letter was dropped in the Bulls office by Shiek Assad Ben loadsamoney Mugabeavitch who had just offered PH a £2.5m investment before going round to inspect the new honourable member in Bradford.

Of course the "finances" are bad because the cash expected to come in over the next few months does not cover the amount committed to go out - but they are not as bad as they were before the pledge - which I contributed to unconditionally - and i think the pledge showed if the new BoD were open with us all then they could proably raise the funds needed to see us into the new season at least from the fans. Of course this talk of administration could relate less to the "finances" and more to the tearing up of existing share certificates?

Because there was no point in collecting it in the first place if administration was the only option. The fundraising will have merely delayed the inevitable.

Because it's been taken under false pretences.

If we had been asked to contribute £100 to see another 5 games of rugby before administration, then fine. I would have still be happy to do so. But that's not what we were told is it? We were told that the pledges would not be called in, etc, yada, yada...
So we were lied to.
Oh no, sorry, no we were not lied to ever were we?

I have a sneaky feeling this could be a windup. I guess we'll see tomorrow or Wednesday though.

Gotta love this guy. Another who sees right through the transparent one.

If administrators are appointed, it will be the new BoD not the old.

And, as Northern Relic observes, not necessarily for just financial reasons.

Surely your ire should be directed at the new BoD should that transpire? Since you can have no idea whatsoever whether, left to their own devices, the previous BoD would have appointed or been able to carry on.

wonder what gives you that sneaky feeling? wouldnt be OP's history of starting rumours that turn out to have no substance would it? thomas cook and asotasi to name a couple

And that very over-zealous caveat outlines precisely as to how thoroughly misguided you have been over a period of months as to the current predicament.

As for your attempted pull-up of Maiselbugs' very logical and accurate observations of your fog-ridden deduction and "inside knowledge", what a dire repost and mitigation for your standpoint. The foot stamping "do not say this", "do not do that" is quite spectacular toy throwing. You are the very point of origin for deductions and assumptions. Your irony is quite beautiful.

Your defence of the previous BoD defies belief. Similarly your spurious claim to be self-aware as to your admittance of 'error' is equally fog-ridden. Camp Caisley have made very few public announcements and yet you have utilised your (some may say jaundiced) knowledge of all things legal to smokescreen some of us less learned with what the "actuality" is, when, on the contrary, it most certainly is not. You have concluded and deducted at every point in the last few months. For you to play Speaker of the Commons and Mr Objective when it now suits your narrative, is farcical.

Maiselbugs has simply tied you in knots as to your assumptions and deducations. You have bagged the current review team before you even know the outcome. And done so with high moral ground that would rival Everest. And that, more than anything, is quite ridiculous.

He has done no such thing. And I thought I made it clear that the tone of my response was merely to reflect his own. If my post is "dire", it speaks volumes for the style of he whose approach I merely emulated.

Your own bias has been and continues to be so totally extreme as to grant you no grounds for criticising the standpoint of others.

Whilst the defence is admirable, it is going down faster than the Concordia. The club mouthpiece is looking foolish once more yet just cannot accept it. It seems anyone who takes issue with this clown is "dishonest". Actually, they are just speaking the truth.

If its true feel very sorry for the fans that put money into the club a few weeks ago to try and save Bradford. This is the reason I wouldn't put any money in when Wakefield were in the same position.

OI YOU

Administrators!? What a load of , the truth is polar opposite - have patience people