Quote Adeybull="Adeybull"On the now-locked thread, an accusation:
was made which - since its in the public domain - I'd like to answer. Then I will refer to it no more.
As I said, I do not recognise that as a quote from me. What I DO recognise is these exchanges, from just before the Leeds match on a thread suggesting we should actually get behind the team:
The "debate" continued, but I won't bore people with the details (check out the thread if you can;t sleep) since apart from some limited backsliding from ME, little of worth was added.
Then, we had, post-match:
Now: I presume this is the exchange where I allegedly said "99% of Bradford fans did not boo as it would be unacceptable" or words to that effect?
If so, I would suggest that - once again - ME has twisted and corrupted what was actually said, and used it out of context. In particular, you will see that the discussion was specifically about the coach being booed when he came out, and my "99%" was clearly referring to the fact that when he DID come out and when his face WAS shown on the big screen you heard little if any booing.
So, ME, I state that your allegation was untruthful.
But I leave the readers to judge for themselves.'"
I am sure people can judge. Last week you were quick to use 99% of the crowd as a reason to back up your own points. This week there were quite a bit more than 1% who appeared to have issues with the coach and the side.
As for it being untruthful? Your inference was clearly there as you suggest that booing was unacceptable at the game.
You used this as a bit of comfort last week but the fact is now that the opinion is clearly different from the one that you spoke of last week.
