Meh, looked OK to me. The one thing I did find distasteful was one of the Bulls players holding aloft an imaginary card trying to influence Ganson into sin-binning a Cas player, which he was going to do anyway. No need for it - it isn't "soccer".

Maybe we should play with them yellow tassles stuck to players shorts that way there is no risk of death caused by shoulder in our game!

I personally thought both the hit/push on blythe and the off the ball hit by whitehead were 2 worse incidents as at least o'brien was probably expecting to be tackled!

It was slightly late and nick hit shoulder to shoulder, it was the whiplash from o'briens neck that caused him to go off, he is also on loan from wire so cas had to make sure he was ok, it was nothing like chase or busquets who hit him a good 5 seconds after he had passed the ball whereas as soon as o'brien passed he was hit nothing a prop can do about that no way can a 16 stone guy pull out of the tackle

Didn't see this yesterday as I was out a Giants match, but having read about this "dreadful tackle" I watched the Sky replay this morning with some interest. Scruton's tackle was a little late so a penalty, no more than that. It has been blown out of proportion because Phil Clark immediatly compared it to the bad one by the Catalans prop the previous week. It was nothing like it.

Having watched it O'brien took one step between passing and the hit, not three or four. Because of the way his body was turned Scruton may not even have seen the pass. Not the best tackle, but no malice imo.

Couldn't have said it better. If you take on the line as a half back you are going to get hits like this....committed,slightly after the ball has gone and most importantly not malicious

A few red amber and black tinted glasses on here. Scruton clearly led with the elbow and connected on the bridge of the lad's nose. As you can see from this [IMAGE] his whole forearm is within the half-back's brain cavity.

Seriously, if a Giant's fan thinks the hit wasn't too bad (and lets face it we aren't having a mutual lovefest of late) then that says something.

I was disgusted to be a Bulls fan after this attack. If Scruton doesn't get a 10000 match ban for that considering the angelic Rangi got two matches then there's something up.

In all seriousess it should have been a penalty but that was it. We're bound to get melodramatic over reaction bile from cas fans like Nottinghamtiger and tigertot but that's due to bias nothing else.

Ere ere

Nowt in it TBH. These things happen all throughout the season and nowt gets mentioned. I reckon these poor Cas fans are just being a bit touchy cos they lost their star player for a couple of games and, as such, they are baying for blood.

If Chase was not serving a ban TBH I doubt nobody from Cas would have remembered the incident, never mind keep banging on about it.

Absolutely no difference to Chase sitting in the stand making a gesture everytime a Bulls player committed an offence in all honesty.

It may well be distasteful and two wrongs don't make a right but Chase was caught on camera a few times "encouraging" the ref to make a decision. Who is to say that the Bulls player was not just getting in a wee bit of retaliation?

Sour grapes which is what we always get after a win against either of the two Wakefield clubs tbh

Ere ere

In fairness I was one of the few Cas fans that said Chase deserved to be banned, and we would gain nothing from Scruton getting banned. I just think the game, as a whole, needs to address the problem we have at the moment with the number of playersn having to leave the field with head injuries. Last week we had a player stop breathing, it won't be long before something worse happens. Obviously, this is my opinion and others are free to have their own!

Whether Chase was dealt with harshly or not is an entirely diff issue. Scruton ctaches him late but was arguably commited to the tackle. Had it not been late it would have been fine. It should have been a penalty in my opinion.

Last week a player stopped breathing after a pretty blatant foul that struck him in the head. It should have been more than four tackles for that as it was a cheap shot.

Chase possibly got two games as a result of media attention but that was a foul none the less.

Just watched the Scruton tackle again, nothing wrong at all, shoulder to shoulder, committed to the tackle.

What crap Phil Clarke talks saying saying it was similar to the Catalan one last week,that one was a shot to the head a fortnight after Salford man had passed the ball