Yes, the undisclosed reason why we let him and his agent screw us over. I won't hold my breath for us to be told.

If indeed there is some "undisclosed reason", has it occurred to you that it might just be "undisclosed" for a reason, that in these litigatious times the club can do fekk all about no matter how much it might wish to?

For what reason would it be undisclosed?

Probably for the same reason that your own personal and medical circumstances are not allowed by statute law to be disclosed?

As an Aside, I see Danny Sculthorpe has been released by Widnes. Maybe his career is well and truly over. Sad, he was a nice guy to talk to. Hope he finds another club though in the lower echelons of the leagues.

The undisclosed reason as to why Matt Orford left us is in Government Files which arn't getting released until January 2110

How can the fact that he is a total ar$e be undisclosed?

No problems with that, it's been in the public domain for some time............

rlSee the lying little toerag has officially been dispensed with.rl

Given he's only managed 6 games, I wonder if the Raiders have used some sort of medical reason for his termination.

poetic justice

rlkerrching againrl this shouldnt be allowed !!!!

I must be out of the loop! What was his reason for leaving the uk?

no mention of his new club (if there is one). If we kept Orford would we not have had this problem also?

There was no possibility whatsoever of us keeping him, so the question is anyway academic. He was determined to go back, and from a lot earlier than he ever acknowledged or admitted. There were big issues with him that meant that we were very well rid of him. Whether his subsequent club had similar issues, and whether (as in our case) the parties deemed it highly inappropriate to play it all out in public - we may never know? But, regardless of whatever physical injuries he may have struggled with this year, I can't say what happened with him at Canberra came as a huge surprise to me.