I've got plenty of opinions of my own ,as you'd see if you looked in threads other than on your pet topic. I choose to avoid commenting in your threads as I just cant be bothered engaging in debate with someone so totally blinkered to other peoples opinions as you come across

On the contrary, I would be very interested. However, if you think I really would lose any sleep over what the assumed suspects have to say then you are very much mistaken.

Wasn't he rendered unable to see it?

Touching.

TBF, I will try my best for you AB, because I kinda respect you more than most on here. Shall we try?

A matter of rlsome debaterl.

"Assumed suspects"? Don't flatter yourself. In fact, I am referring to people who either rarely post on here now (you and Asim and the Negative Tendency generally being the principal reason) or who are mere readers and don't ever post.

One of those people - who sits very near to me - has indicated he would have serious difficulty resisting the urge to deck you if he ever met you. Most of the others, whilst angry with your attitude, just think its sad how someone can let their obsession with being the big man and always right turn them into what you appear to have become.

So there you have it. Warts and all.

And having seen your post written while I was writing this...I am more than willing to not jump down your throat every five minutes if you'll at least try and meet half-way.

Now that is not in the spirit of TGG is it?

However, I reckon you should find a seat away from Mr McNamara and all will be forgiven.

Cool. Agreed.

Its a good job you wasn't a Northern fan, You'd have been well at home writing for the steam pig fanzine

Sorry Adey but I thinks that's a little unfair and just basing that on poster's you know. I know for a fact that their is 4 posters who hardly ever post mainly because of the attitude of 5 well known posters who definitely can't be classed at the NT gang.

Fair call, although I was responding to personal comments aimed at me. Although in fairness I don't see or talk regularly to any posters from the NT, so I really can only go on those I do know. I DO bump into people I know who are of that persuasion, and I respect their views, but I don't know whether they post on here or read on here - the latter at least must be probable.

But I think what you say leads to an important point - and its one that someone else alluded to on another thread earlier. What I think we have seen is a polarising of opinion on here of those who are concerned for and about the club - and in the main who are passionate supporters (even if they don't think they are... ). This inevitably pushes people to take more extreme positions than they otherwise might - ME, FA, af being good examples - and so increases the likelihood of group A getting right up the noses of group B. And it becomes increasingly hard to sit in the middle in group C! If that makes sense?

I guess that's sort of inevitable when people get frustrated with what they see as below-expectations performance on the park. The situation is not helped by the Punisher-types, whose object in life seems to be to sow discord and dissent wherever they tread and exacerbate the polarisation. After all, its much easier to attack a house divided?

Given that we are nearly all Bulls fans - one or two have come out of the closet and admitted they never were - then surely, in what are not the easiest of times for the club, we need to stand together a bit more? And if that means those at each of the poles cutting those at the other a little more slack, and reigning back on trying to grind the other down, that would be a sensible thing?

Sad news, but did no-one tell them of the OTT attention seeking procedure they were supposed to follow?