Sky's result screen at the end of the game gave the attendance as 13,269

Well we know its one out of a possible five figures

The Bulls tried everything to get the stay away supporters to come to this game, how many do you think will come back to another game after this performance!!!!!

I should think lots. Some big mistakes, sure, but overall, a very creditable effort from a weakened team, and in the face of some ludicrous decisions, so anyone who watched it must have been happy with the efforts if not the outcome.

League Express will have the correct figure in tomorrow

Looked more than 11k.

Sorry Ferocious can not agree with you there we are over half way through the season and we are still making basic mistakes the iffy fans will not want to pay money and see another so called credible performance even if the ref makes poor decisions. a lot of fans I was with certainly weren’t happy with the performance.

I thought the band and singer before hand were brilliant.

Leeds were without Webb, Burrow, Peacock and Lauititi (sp). They were weakened too. More than we were some may argue.

Official from the Bulls:

"Please note that the Bulls official attendance for the game against Leeds Rhinos was 13,269 and NOT 11,995 as reported on some websites and in some newspapers. Can you please amend your records accordingly and, as this is the second time this has happened in the past few weeks, in future can you please wait for the crowd figure to be given at the Media Conference following the game."

Thank God I, and pretty well most posters on here, do not have the misfortune to live on Planet Eddie. Where the inhabitants appear to spend most of their miserable lives catching people doing things wrong, and finding fault in everything, and looking at everything in the most miserable light possible.

It must be a very depressing place indeed.

What was wrong with that post then?

It seems that I am damned if I do and damned if I don't. My take on the game is how I saw it and if people do not agree with it then fair enough, but to continually say that I live in a depressing place is a bit unfair, especially when I have battled depression for years.

FA said that we were weakened, so were Leeds, therefore using that as a reason for defeat is a bit rich IMO. However, it must just be cos I am depressed.

Leeds have far better resources for dealing with absences than we do.

Langley, Orford and Kearney would probably be the first 3 names on the team sheet every week; they were a big miss for sure. In addition, we do not have the luxury of depth to adequately cover such big gaps.