Depends on opinions that....

His grasp of the English language and constant harping back to the same argument that nobody is actually disputing, suggests otherwise. He's either an idiot or a genius at pretending to be an idiot.

Whats boring is reading constant chelping from.some bradford fans re a £2 charge to get to the 70m stand.
Your entrance into the ground is the same as me. It entitles you access to everywhere in the ground other than the new 70m stand. No-one has to pay to get in there. I may or may not choose to do just that
The entrance to see the game is £18.
Which is still cheaper than odsal... which despite all the chelping is the irony that gingdong is presumably referring to.
I dont get this "its the principle" sheeite either. Neither do i care.

Chirst on a bike how hard is this to grasp.

No one is complaining that we have to pay £18 hell no one would moan if the ground fee was £20, the issue is that after a load of fans have paid £18 to enter the ground only to be told, by the way if you want to go into a stand its another £2, if this was mentioned before hand or if the prices incremented as bradfords do to sit then everyone would be fine.

BUT the fact is that on your website the price states
Admission Prices
Adult: £18
OAP/Concession: £12
Child: £5

This does not mention that the price is different to sit or to stand but as Bradford will bring over 1000 fans it seems like Fev are cashing in on the raised number of fans, what i can see happening is that Bradford will arrive and be directed to the stand and coerced into paying the extra £2 fee which is wrong, if no one pays it and packs into the stand health and safety would have a fit and force fans to move thus scuppering the extra fee as they cant implement this if it counters the safety of fans.

Im now fed up with it, hopefully no one pays the fee and is moved anyway but we will see, plan on getting in early and finding a seat so i dont have to pay.

Its an outrage...
:rolleyes:

Stupid?

Dunno.... are you?

It really is quite worrying isn't it? How the same halfwits continue to totally ignore what people are actually annoyed about, and instead continue to argue something that none of us are actually arguing. Maybe reading and thinking at the same time is too much for them, I'm not sure. But I fully expect a totally bloody irrelevant counter argument of "it's cheaper than Odsal" to come up at least another 5 or 6 times from each of them.

He doesn't know if he's stupid!

YCMIU

I'll happily pay £2 to stop talking about this.

It certainly wasn't what I [iwanted[/i, but it was what you [idid[/i. If you want to leave it out now, I'm sure nobody will argue.

Pity the games hasn't been switched to Odsal

On the topic of the match, Leeds loaning 3 players to fev for the end of the season seems to be an odd one to me.

1- Surely Leeds profit more from a game against us than against what has become their academy side with fev.
2- I thought fev were happy with their squad and hadn't needed any Leeds players really to be where they are. (Or at least as they would have you believe)

If Fev get through, it's a much easier 2 points from that game for Leeds than it would be against us. Sure they'd beat us too, but it'd be even easier to beat a Fev side who have players in that will be back at Leeds next year, or in fact don't allow said players to play and Fev have to look at disillusioned players who knew they're only in until the Rhinos Reserve grade are back next week.

Is what I would say if I was cynical.