There is no technically still in administration. The company still exists and is still in administration. https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06309280 We know how quickly it gets updated. The RFL have told the administrator to do one.

There is no technically still in administration. The company still exists and is still in administration. https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06309280 We know how quickly it gets updated. The RFL have told the administrator to do one.

I understand that the RFL are going to announce the new owners as part of the half time show at the Grand Final.

[code[code][/code][/code

Yes, hence the final sentence.

Golden gamble style?

First prize is a jar of Uncle Joe's mint balls.

Sorry to change the subject. Who was the guy hoping for good news cos he was going in for a cancer op? Is he back on hear?

So just to be clear we're assuming that although Bulls are in admin at some point they will be liquidated because the RFL will never grant the administrated company a licence? And that the RFL have four candidates to receive a licence under NewCo?

I would guess so.

A question for Bradford fans, would you prefer someone who says they are going to throw money at the situation or someone who is going to try something new but run the club on a tight leash?

As a fan of another club I'm just interested in what the fans want the new club to look like, and how they'd accept it being run.

$hit or bust..

Ideally the former, if they have the funds to back it up. I want our club to have a sugardaddy so we can compete with the big boys. However, I'm not too bothered either way as long as they actually do what they say they are going to do. A permanently mediocre first team who actually have some camaraderie and spirit and occasionally play above themselves will have my support.

I'm not sure what "try something new" means. Need more information.

I think everyone is just worried that the organisation that gave the Bulls Steve Ferres is now deciding who should run the new club.

Can't speak for others but wouldn't it have been smarter to get the bids judged by outside agency so that there could be no accusation of favouritism

I'm sure I read somewhere that they are sharing details of the bids?
Or was that just Mick that said it?

Tony Stark.