No doubt if it doesn't it would be viewed as favouritism. We should be looking no higher than the Pennine League for loan signings, it's only fair.

The sharks thing is misleading. The RFL have actually applied another penalty. All opposition teams can field one shark or another man eating animal of their choice as an additional defender.

But Barrie McDermott has retired.

But on the plus side, it gets rid of the chancers who have no money and are trying to get the fans to pay for everything. The Richard Lambs of the world who shout from the rooftops every time there's an admin, but does absolutely nothing when push comes to shove. The Mark Moores of the world who try to buy the club with the season ticket money, who have already walked out on the club TWICE by spitting dummies about points being deducted.

As much as everyone wants a prudent business plan, the first year is going to take someone with some financial clout. Not some "all mouth, no trousers" bull$hit merchant like Lamb or Moore. If the RFL guidelines makes sure they have no involvement, they're doing at least one thing right.

I personally don't want either of those two anywhere near the club. Especially Mark Moore after his last "efforts" of getting people's hopes up, then dashing them all over again.

At least if there are only three of them the question of whether VAT is payable on the subs won't come up.

Not checked the rules, but I doubt it would even be mentioned. Players are players, full stop

Quote Ste100Centurions="Ste100Centurions"What happened to the guy with the waste processing plant proposal ? WTF did the RFL not agree to a 3 way deal, RFL & 2 interested parties ? Sell the lease to the $hithole to the waste guy, he buys the land & stadium from Bradford Council, he bulldozes the lot & builds his plant. RFL get ££££ for lease & agree Bulls can groundshare & start 2017 in CH1 with new owner & ground share somewhere affordable. Promote the highest placed CH1 Club to take Bulls slot. Council get money, RFL get money, Bulls get to survive & rebuild properly, albeit from CH1, whats the £€CK!N' problem ? Everyone is satisfied (at differing levels). Is this too simplistic a view or completely unworkable ? Yours in sport.'" This is why www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/n ... quidation/ Seems prospects for the club were defeated because there were questions unanswered. Anyway why would anyone invest, what would be an extraordinary amount of money without knowing the whole picture. To edit-: "Rationally, the days where a sports club operates at a loss and is underwritten by a Patron should be gone." as the administrator suggests. Try telling that to the Majority of sports clubs.

Quote Ste100Centurions="Ste100Centurions"What happened to the guy with the waste processing plant proposal ? WTF did the RFL not agree to a 3 way deal, RFL & 2 interested parties ? Sell the lease to the $hithole to the waste guy, he buys the land & stadium from Bradford Council, he bulldozes the lot & builds his plant. RFL get ££££ for lease & agree Bulls can groundshare & start 2017 in CH1 with new owner & ground share somewhere affordable. Promote the highest placed CH1 Club to take Bulls slot. Council get money, RFL get money, Bulls get to survive & rebuild properly, albeit from CH1, whats the £€CK!N' problem ? Everyone is satisfied (at differing levels). Is this too simplistic a view or completely unworkable ? Yours in sport.'" This is why www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/n ... quidation/ Seems prospects for the club were defeated because there were questions unanswered. Anyway why would anyone invest, what would be an extraordinary amount of money without knowing the whole picture. To edit-: "Rationally, the days where a sports club operates at a loss and is underwritten by a Patron should be gone." as the administrator suggests. Try telling that to the Majority of sports clubs.

According to some it will be sorted by tomorrow so we will have to wait and see..

I personally would like at least one more due diligence announcement.

or at least one more deadline extention

Quote exiledbull="exiledbull"This is why www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/n ... quidation/ Seems prospects for the club were defeated because there were questions unanswered. Anyway why would anyone invest, what would be an extraordinary amount of money without knowing the whole picture. To edit-: "Rationally, the days where a sports club operates at a loss and is underwritten by a Patron should be gone." as the administrator suggests. Try telling that to the Majority of sports clubs. '" Well indeed. In the absence of a crystal ball I'll have to entertain myself with other things while I wait impatiently for tomorrow - I wonder which recently exiled Bull you are then? Hmmm...

Quote exiledbull="exiledbull"This is why www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/n ... quidation/ Seems prospects for the club were defeated because there were questions unanswered. Anyway why would anyone invest, what would be an extraordinary amount of money without knowing the whole picture. To edit-: "Rationally, the days where a sports club operates at a loss and is underwritten by a Patron should be gone." as the administrator suggests. Try telling that to the Majority of sports clubs. '" Well indeed. In the absence of a crystal ball I'll have to entertain myself with other things while I wait impatiently for tomorrow - I wonder which recently exiled Bull you are then? Hmmm...

or a delayed imminent announcement

No enjoyment out of this mucker, as a Leigh fan I've been in dark places to many times.