Cramer states, "We are aware that Bradford believe there was an early-termination clause but that was not what was agreed."

This is very curious language. Bradford believe there WAS an early termination clause. Does it no longer exist? 'but that was not what was agreed'. is he saying the contract contains a 'clause' that wasn't agreed.

Either, Green has had site of a written clause in the contract.
or
Cummins gave his word to Green at the outset of the season in front of witnesses that he would resign if we were in the relegation places at a certain juncture.
or
There is no verbal or written clause .

I wonder if MG is trying to argue that with relegation his 3rd yr would be null and void ala a playing contract? Not sure if coaches contracts would be same as players, ie a super league contract???

Interesting point.

You would have thought though that if this was the case it would form part of the written contract - so would not be open to dispute?

If that is the case would suspect MG is arguing we were as good as down and ended up relegated and FC is arguing mathematically we weren't down? Also could FC be claiming without a six point deduction and admin that meant him getting rid of 3 players meant he had little chance. Could say all arguments hold water hence no agreement can be reached

Yes, but adages aren't that reliable as a source of legal precedent

Didn't she repeal the truck acts?

I believe it was during her reign. Perhaps it would have saved previous regimes by paying players in vouchers redeemable only in the club shop?

Well, that's where I've spent most of my wages over the years..

Didn't' George Best say the same?