Which, in what I'll refer to as your mind, has exactly what relevance to the matter?

that bit made me spit my coffee out

As in one Asian restaurant pumping money into another Asian restaurants business,keep up to speed oh patronising one!

I realise using different words is tough, so I'll break it down for you into more manageable baby chunks. Read them one at a time. It may help:

1. You said "Asian businessman" not "Asian restaurant".

2. The offer was not from an "Asian restaurant".

3. It was from a businessman. Who indeed in this case happens to be an Asian.

4. I asked you, why is the fact that he is an "Asian" businessman relevant? (Clue -it's not fscking relevant)

I didn't bypass the swearometer, I used a new word which isn't a rude word. The idea is a bit like the Fokkers series of films. Though I'd bet there are some dumb Fokkers out there whose jerky knees object to it.

The Bulls is not a restaurant. The offer was not from Akbars. Now jog on.

So the school teacher bit was correct, I'd also assume it's primary level with your pathetic little put downs,jog on,good grief!!

You either mistakenly or inappropriately made a stupid comment about Asian businessmen. I've explained why, so stop playing little miss indignant, accept you were wrong and deal with it.

My work here is done. Goodbye.

Miss indignant, you really can't resist can you? Bless,back to school tomorrow. If anyone dares to question you...Put em on the naughty step!! That's a good boy.

Funnily enough, he's not a teacher. He's a lawyer.

And runs rings round wakners (there is another new word for you) and fekkwits for fun. As he has again demonstrated.

My mates a lawyer! LOL.
Never noticed the rings round me! You really do look pathetic fighting his corner!! Bless.
If we can by pass the swear filter you really do make yourself look a ,oh and a winker, see what I did there? Yeah,very childish....
Night lawyer...And your apologist! Xx
As FA would say,jog on.

....and I think this has run its course now.