All those clubs have wanted Jamie Langley and still do.

Hell yes sign him up.

Ablett no, Burgess has time on his side but atm Langley's certainly a better, more consistant performer. I'd take him over Kirke anyday but you have to take into account that Langley is probably one of your top earning forwards, Kirke certainly doesn't fit this bracket at Leeds.

As for Bailey I'm really not sure tbh.

Either way I do rate Langley and am aware of his importance in your team. Although MOS candidate is going a little overboard.

You think Ablett is a better player than Langley?

I think Menzies, Hall, Lynch and possibly Scruton will be on more than Langley, although Langley's next contract will be his biggie.

People are only saying MoS candidate because of the way he's started, certainly not on 2009 form.

I'd compare Langley to JJB in Leeds' second-row, rather than Ablett, Kirke etc, and most of Langleys stats show he has more to offer than JJB - More meters per carry, more tackles, less missed tackles and less errors & penalties.

Jesus H, one win against a crap Cas side & you've Man of Steel. He is finally fulfilling his potential mind.

Thanks a lot. You nearly made me fire tea through my nose then.

Another 'I only follow my own team but still have opinions of every player in the league shocker'

You guys crack me up...so full of $h!7. Basically you have just named Leeds' low profile forwards. You've asked me a question of "would you take our best forward (seen as you rate him MOS) for one of your lesser forwards?"

The question you should of asked is "So you wouldn't take him over Peacock, Kylie, Ali, Eastwood, Sinfield".


My comment was Leeds, Wire, Saints,Wigan would LOVE Langley in their line-up. e.g star player status.


Ablett, Burgess and Bailey definately not. I rate Ablett and Burgess above him already and their only young and will without a doubt improve over the next couple of years and maybe be future England stars.

At this present time im not a huge fan of Kirke so maybe...but i doubt Leeds will go hell bent on getting Langleys signature just because he may be better than Kirke.

no

Look at Langley's stats over Burgess, Ablett, Kirke, Bailey and even JJB. He trounces them all.

my stats say langley was on a beach whilst jjb was having massive games in play offs and gf's. proving time after time he's a champion cog in a champion team. same can be said about bailey, ablett, kirke and burgess who have 15 gf rings between them. but langley is a champion at having a sun tan by gf night

Langley was in the '05 GF team that beat Leeds, so yes, he can play in big finals, even if they are few and far in between.