Yes -I think he could do a job for us. Pretty decent winger and IMO a little better than Sheriffe.
Yes - Injury was a problem last year but not I hear a repetative one.
No- Don't know the extent of his involvement in alleged criminal proceedings and his risk of a custodial sentance.
Yes- we could probably sign him reasonably cheap with provisos on his fitness and availability.
No- I dont think we will sign him. He adds little to the squad.

I'd be quite peeved if Bradford signed Raynor, too much baggage and bound to have an unsettling influence at a time when all seems rather positive. Needed like a second ar$ehole IMO.

There was also rlthisrl.

I would rather have Sheriffe, he's not the best player but he has protential, doesnt have baggage, not injury prone and still young.

Sheriffe wasn't half bad at London and if he can regain some form and sort himself out defensively then he isn't too bad.

He's not good enough never will be.

I think you know thats a bit harsh. He's never going to be word class, granted, but I think he can be decent enough (Leeds home) but that needs to be consistent, and lets face it, he won't be on a massive contract either.

I agree with RER on this, Sheriffe is never going to be good enough for a top team. I really don't see this "potential" that people keep saying he's got.

Every team has to have the odd average player though in order to pay the top ones a decent wage.