Don't need him back,hes made his bed let him lay in it.

The worry is that it has free reign on the T@A boards to dis the Bulls, its players, coaches and management which to those readers (both fans or casuals) may be induced to give credence to its vituperous comments.
On this board it was clear that it's sole intention was to destabalise support for the Bulls and having failed has now moved onto pastures new - perhaps more productive in media terms.
It's a prolific poster in the T&A with a single agenda. I fail to see why it should be so consistently bitter and twisted with totally irrational comments. But hey, what do I know about its twisted motivations.

That's making a great big assumption from a simple turn of phrase!
Nobby is perhaps putting feelers out via rumours to let people know he's available?
I think he'll go to another club. Someone perhaps with plenty of money but a few problems on the pitch.
That's not based on anything but opinion. Plus I don't think we could afford to pay a massive salary to a "director of rugby" just to be in charge of Steve Mac.

No thanks

Noble to Rhinos.

No, can't see that happening.

There have been rumours but why would the club say anything about Hape/Vainikolo for Leeds. They have nothing to do with the Bulls. The Noble rumour is all about the Bulls. You always complain that the club never says anything and then you all complain and try to read something else into it when they do. Lose-lose situation. Perhaps they would be better keeping quiet about everything and then you can say they don't tell us what's going on.

He is clearly referring to when they [iwere[/i at Bradford. Hence the reason why he mentioned the term "last few years."

Do keep up Mr Duffy.

Noble was at Headingley yesterday...

Thank you ME it's not rocket science.

So a rumour about two leading Bulls players potentially moving to another club has "nothing to do with the Bulls" but a rumour about Wigan's coach being linked with us is "all about the Bulls"? It looks more to me as if they are comparable stories. They both involve the Bulls in equal measure surely?

Indeed.

As I understand it, the Wigan board don't want to be seen as sacking yet another coach.

Wigan (allegedly) contacted Bradford re: Noble, with the intention of (if the Bulls accepted) creating the impression Noble had "chosen" to leave.

Again, "as I understand it", Bradford or not, he won't be offered another contract at Wigan.