Apologies if someone has already said this, but wouldn't you have been better telling him this then and there instead of hoping he was on a forum so you could do your "keyboard warrior" bit?

Its always great to see fans, standing by there team in there hour of need...












...no really it is.

I'm losing the will to live.

We're arguing about the right to boo the team, the coach or both. We each have an opinion and we pay our money and have a right to show our disapproval if we so desire.

It was asked in this thread if someone was a sheep because they boo'd, I find that statement ill informed and wrong. As a fan what are you supposed to do if your team play poorly consistently over a considerable period of time, at what point do you stop clapping, cheering and keeping hope? If people don't question what's happening then nothing changes and we'd continue as we are, happily clapping our team off loss, after loss..people have opinions it's one of the things that differs us (amongst a few others) from sheep

I've not boo'd yet but i might, I want the team to turn it around under SM's leadership but I'm beginning to believe it's not going to happen....sooner rather than later something needs to change either we start winning (or looking like we can) or the management changes. Despite what the PR machine is spurting out, i'm sure everybody associated with the club is aware that they need to start winning, my only wish is they actually started to put out stories about where we are as opposed the great things being seen week in week out, despite us losing.

For the love of God.

I was booing yes, I spend thousands watching Bradford home & away and have every god dam right to do as I please if the product on the pitch is not right.

What are we all to do, just imagine that we are top of the table and playing error free Rugby League.

The facts are fans shouldn't be telling other fans to f**k off and tell them that they are not wanted by the club.

Well said. At times a team deserves to be booed, especially when they are underperforming exceptionally.

So what you're saying is that you want the freedom to say or do whatever you want, but you don't want other people to have that same freedom?

What's the difference? You want the freedom to tell the players they were awful and you disapprove of their performance, but you don't want someone else to have that same freedom to tell you he disapproves of what you're doing?

Agreed, although people need to understand that people have different tolerance levels to performances, just because someone doesn't agree with something doesn't make it wrong...or right.

The difference is I don't go round telling people to go f**k off or tell them not to come again.

I was booing at McNamara NOT the players

He has let Halley go who I regard as one of our better players.

At least he gives 110% out there on the field.

Well what is?

Shall I stand with you at the next home game and tell everyone near you to f**k off?

It is though, Mick's got a Laser Boo, it can be directed at the ear of the intended target, and none of the players would even hear it, so they wouldn't ever think it might be directed at them.

Todays episode (for those of you with toddlers) was Police Station Boo. I haven't seen Laser Boo yet although garden centre Boo was good last week

The thing was, the players all thought it was "Moo", and was a new sound of solidarity from the fans

There were plenty of people telling McNamara to f**k off and not come again. Which is essentially what you were doing too by booing him.

What's the difference?