Just watched the re-run and i thought last night after Crookes' 3rd try Eddie is raving about winning the game. At that point we are 6 in front with at least 2 mins left. Sammut's goal from touchline was massive. If he misses and they get ball back nearly on our line with 2 to go and 6 behind it was far from over!! Great kick, lets hope he doesnt get a ban

If he does, is it BK, KP, DA or can we recall Briggs for next week?

If Sammut is cited I would be showing the Cockayne challenge on Whitehead versus Wakefield. He had two swinging shots at Whitehead and didn't even receive a warning! I expect that it will be penalty sufficient, it was silly play but not a lot in it.

Hats off to Mick Potter for the way he juggled his interchanges with just 2 players. He's impressed me so far this season.

Well done Mr Potter

No. It's for the season and no recall.

theres certainly more consistency in Potters selections this season compared to the start of last, and its starting to show in eg the understanding of Bateman Lulia Crookes.

Sammut for me. We're light up front but I'm more and more convinced by the Langley to prop argument. If Addy has more games like that then loose is his to lose. We have lots of people who can do hard work, and we're more likely to be able to recruit forwards than someone else with the spark of Sammut - especially if we have to meet quota requirements at the same time.

The only reason to get rid of Sammut for me is if Bridge comes very good, and even if he's the best player in the Championship this year I don't see that proving much about him. He's been that or very close to it before. Sammut is getting better with every game. I think his work rate with us is way higher than it was with the Crusaders.

Manuokafoa would have to seriously rip up some trees to make him the priority for me atm. He does look useful though.

You mean Briggs?

Doh. Yes I do.

I'd agree with that. Sammut has been defending very well for his size. Manese looks solid, though twice yesterday he looked for the offload when it really wasn't needed.

Got to agree re Sammut, he seemed to be a bit part, off the cuff player at Crusaders. But at Bradford he's seems to have got back some of his team play that got him noticed in the NRL! Reminds me a lot of Deacs in his prime, not the great kicker Deacs was, but improving, with confidence every game and seems to relish the extra responsibility, Manuokafoa as has already been said is very handy player to have around but at the moment Sammuts the man!

Like your scapegoats don't you. What did pryce do wrong? Played pretty well IMO hit the ball up well and was pretty solid. The interception which set up lulia's finish was well timed and well received.

Someone else said manuokafoa made too many mistakes too, don't recall seeing any

Very good night

Agree about Pryce, did absolutely nothing wrong last night but still came in for criticism during and after the game. Did exactly what was asked of him.

Completely agree. I thought he actually did alright. Looks like he's shed a few pounds as well.

Let's remember, it was his first game under the new regime. He can only get better!!

Pryce was fine last night.

What game were some of you guys watching?

Is it so hard to admit you might have prejudged him in RAB just a bit?

It was first game for about 6 months. The guy had no pre-season, and nothing more than a couple of brief appearances in the U20s.

I thought he did OK, and will only improve as he gets fitter and sharper