I think it was more the fact he kept interrupting Guilfoyle when he was trying to put his message across. He came across as nothing more than a heckler.

But yes, the man clearly said some things to suggest he was more than just a heckler.

Aaron, maybe he was struggling to understand why Guilfoyle kept saying there was nobody showing any interest, when he clearly had a strong view to the contrary?

I remember when you stated that, maybe there is some truth.

Could this be a defining day?

Maybe so, I agree with what you're saying don't get me wrong.

What probably annoyed most people, is that he seemed to be very proud of the fact he knew of two investors, but would not divulge into who they were when pushed by people.

Hey, if it turns out to be true I'll retract my statement. Kind of getting mixed messages, it seems to me that Aaron is saying that he was coy and wanted to keep things confidential and here you are saying that he identified himself and confirmed discussions. I dont know because I wasnt there.

Oh, he identified himself. It's just that he kept several cards close to his chest.

He was asked who these investors were after he'd banged on about them in front of everyone for ten minutes, only to reply that it was 'confidential'. Which only serves to infuriate people further, in my opinion.

So if we had 800k on the table only last week, and 500k from 'Greenwoods', whats the problem?

Me neither. Stood outside in the rain getting pìssed on.

But I managed it in the end, thanks to a very nice lady on reception

Did you show her your credentials?

www.itv.com/news/calendar/2012-0 ... goes-bust/

www.itv.com/news/calendar/2012-0 ... goes-bust/

Was this just another "Hood Forum" type meeting. A lot of talking, no-one leaves with any new info, just more frustration. Sounds like it to be honest, unfortunately.

Guilfoyle said the £800k was in the form of soft loans, NOT investment. Was that what people thought Mr Caisley was bringing?

Bear in mind though that we do not know how near or otherwise the Greenwoods deal was to being agreed before the Intervention, nor do we know if the due dilligence identified impediments or concerns, and nor do we know how likely investment would be now.

Something that has been really bugging me since the meeting: all the talk was of needing only a fairly modest amount to see out the season. A far cry from the £1.2m that was being talked about before. Then when someone asked about the £800k that was supposed to be already sitting there available, Guilfoyle said that was in the form of soft loans (I heard some folk express that it was "only loans"icon_wink.gif and that these "might be available still" to any supporter-owned investment vehicle.

???

We either needed that £800k or we did not.

If it "may" be available, but all the talk was of engineering a supporter-owned vehicle to invest in the club but not on the scale of £1.2m, then something does not stack up somewhere?

I hope someone who has been party to all this - there seemed to be quite a few at the front - can clarify, since I was quite confused as to just how much money WOULD be needed, and from whom?

Quote....
[iGuilfoyle, who was accompanied by sports lawyer David Hinchcliffe, a Bulls fan, told supporters he had been "dealt a very poor set of cards".[/i

David Hinchcliffe - quick Google shows his background.