HC, Irvine's probably contracting. Will work for himself so correct in saying he's not working for the bulls and probably couldn't be 4rsed correcting someone during a short TV interview?

Keeps the reported headcount down but gets a role filled...

Technically, ANY club that is a member of the RFL should have full access to utilise Odsal Stadium seeing the governing body hold the lease contract. We don't want the RFL showing any bias do we.

Sums it up nicely.

As a Wakey fan, I see this merely as MC and the other SL Charimen seeking to ensure that something they (the RFL) paid the old regime GBP 1.33m for is not sold back to the new Bulls regime at a cut price GBP 750k (which is what in their accounts the RFL are now saying it is worth)as it is worth more than that

That seems fair enough to me.

Are you saying that the rfl have been disingenuous with their valuation of the odsal lease?
You might want to be careful how you phrase your opinions.

It's clear to me that if Rimmer had been in charge rather than Wood the RFL would never have done that deal on Odsal. Now he's in charge he seems to want to get it off the RFL's hands.

Many of the SL chairman can't stand Chalmers it seems so they don't want the lease sold to him. Not that I think he could afford it TBH, even at a knock down price.

RFL rules prevent other club owners having a piece of it anyway.

I don't expect this to be sorted quickly nor do I expect the value of the lease to ever get back to £1.3m.

The man's obsessed with us. Have Wankfield got a ground to play at next season yet?

Can we still walk away in 2019? If that's the case we should just walk.

Who knows Keith?

Realistically where would we go? Neither Valley Parade or Horsfall are suitable. We'd never afford the rent at VP and we'd be at risk of being told we're not wanted at the end of any contract. Horsfall is little better than a school field and would cost heaps to bring up to standard.

It's owned on behalf of ALL professional clubs not just SL.

Specifically it’ll be the contractual terms of the head lease between Council & RFL and then the sublease between RFL & Bradford which will determine the legal rights of the 3 parties.

Is it just me or is one of the in the know s from last administration back with a new username trying to stir again?

Probably Mat but nothing's been said that isn't in the public domain anyway. So much for being in the know. Innuendo doesn't count.