You can't reveal your sources because its boll0cks.

Still got the potential to be a really good player. Another good signing if true.

=#FFFFFF(sends tigertot a friendly full toss.........)


Er, so are most people on the planet, tbf

I wouldn't be disappointed to learn we'd signed Luke - he's got good pace for a start which is something we can't always boast he used to be a decent finisher too IIRC. As quite as few have said, Jamie Foster has more hallmarks of a centre than winger so it would give us a bit more versatility in the backs.

I will expect an apology when it's announced

It would make no sense to sign Hodgson.

If you are so sure of it, name your source. You won't be expecting anything, as its a complete load of bull!

Thought we was on about Luke George

With the best will in the world, people who genuinely have a real source, are, for rather blatantly obvious reasons, not often going to name it, now are they?

Thus whether or not a poster "names their source" is not a valid test of whether (or not) they have a source. If you had a mole from whom you learned inside info, you wouldn't betray their confidence and possibly prejudice them by revealing their identity, now would you?

To me, you can only go by track record on these types of thing. And roger's got form.

I don't get that much Bulls info these days,it's more Leeds info,although I was wrong about Bailey but got the 2 under 19s going to New Zealand correct

My bad roger, thought you were saying Hodgson would be confirmed next.

No probs my friend,George is definately coming

Regarding Hodgson,I also didn't believe but was told it is happening

Suppose only time will tell,if he doesn't come I will hold my hand up and say I was told wrongly,but Thomas Bosc is also lined up,time will tell on that one as well

Hodgson is not ooc, do you honestly expect us to be paying transfer fees in our position?

Bosc is at least ooc, but I still can't see it happening. And if you take FC on his word, neither can he.