Quote LeagueDweeb="LeagueDweeb"Not having a pop at anyone at all. Certainly not the Bulls owners, players or fans. Just calling it as it actually is.'"
"Calling it as it is" my arrrrrse.
Quote LeagueDweebThe RFL has been consistent in the … level of punishment in both cases of administration at the Bulls. '"
Yes, if you think that the last time being fined one year’s Sky money, and the second time not being fined at all, is consistent.
Quote LeagueDweebFirst time round there was no prospect of a new owner, the RFL was funding the business and creditors were not going to be paid a penny. Liquidation was the outcome for the holding company. '"
Liquidation is the end game for the first time, as it will be for the second time. Of course there was the prospect of a new owner. Had there been no prospect then we wouldn’t have got one.
Quote LeagueDweebSecond time round, although there was a prospect of new owners, they were not taking over the existing holding company. This was the case with OK. He set up a new holding company, as did Moore et al. '"
You are contradicting yourself. As you now say, neither was taking over the old company. But we all know this. It wasn’t even news when it was news.
Quote LeagueDweebNo creditors were to be paid a penny. The only difference is the timing of the new holding company seeking to take over. '"
Rubbish. You clearly know nothing, and all the info is in the myriad posts and threads so maybe you could start by reading them before spouting nonsense. Just for instance, the administrator in his initial report to creditors stated that the proposal of BB2014 was that ALL trade creditors would be paid, as opposed to your version.
Quote LeagueDweebThe new holding company owned by Marc Green has no intention of paying any creditors of OK Bulls, so the 6 point penalty is absolutely correct & consistent. '"
So they have disclosed all that to you, have they? In fact, nothing has been stated in public about the proposals to pay any money to any creditors or not. We therefore don’t know. And you don’t know. I would be surprised if he was paying much but that is pure speculation so stop stating it as if you know because you don’t. And of course the question of “consistency” is a red herring as the totality of any sanctions is all we can compare, not picking out one element. OKB failed largely because of the massive (and unprecedented) sanction of one year’s loss of funding on top of the points deduction so you really cannot equate te two situations.
Quote LeagueDweebGreen has no chance of getting any points back. '"
If that is your opinion fair enough, we are none of us at all hopeful on here either. But the fact is you have no idea as to the detailed arguments of the appeal nor have we since they have not been made public so again this is pure speculation.
Quote LeagueDweeb he deliberately placed OK Bulls into administration to protect his debenture, therefore it was not unforeseen or unavoidable. '"
How come you do not seemingly know that he was not the owner, or even a bidder, at that point? Do you not understand that the appeal is being pursued by BBNL, not by Marc Green? Do you not understand that the debenture was held by a different company, not by Marc Green personally?
You seriously need to do some reading before getting involved in any discussions as with respect your uninformed claims add nothing. You're calling it as it
isn't.
