Speaking of getting on the players' backs, I have re-read what was said after the Dewsbury game.
Quote We drew at Batley and got beaten at Dewsbury against teams :1w6zrgo2who were far more enthusiastic than ours appeared to be:1w6zrgo2.
Ferres reflected: "We drew at Batley and got beaten at Dewsbury against teams who were far more enthusiastic than ours appeared to be.
"We will need to match the level of enthusiasm of whoever we play moving forward to fully show the undoubted ability that we've got in the team.
...
"I think if our enthusiasm levels are where they should be, then we have the ability to win games'"
So, Ferres said that OUR ENTHUSIASM LEVELS were NOT WHERE THEY SHOULD BE. Ferres thought they looked insufficiently bothered. And to the extent that he said so publicly!
That is an alarmingly damning public indictment from your MD. It means he thinks they weren't trying hard enough. Not bothered, Put it whatever way you want, that's the inside view.
Lowes said:
Quote We drew at Batley and got beaten at Dewsbury against teams :1w6zrgo2who were far more enthusiastic than ours appeared to be:1w6zrgo2.
after losing at Dewsbury ...some of the stuff we did was unacceptable for our standards. We've had to regroup and we've had some harsh words to say to each other. '"
So, arguing in the camp, people blaming each other? "Unacceptable" stuff?
Isn't the booing from some fans just their way of making the same points?