I knew about the VAT on the lease, and reported this was outstanding at the time of the pledge. It is entirely factual, not alleged. Indeed, I had an argument with Hood about it, as eleven others will attest. The invoice was dated January 2012, and the VAT was not payable until the end of April 2012 - so at the time of the pledge it was not even due for payment. I said this at the time, although I did not know the amount (I expected it might be a bit more, tbh) until that was later reported.

It was patently clear to us that the club had used that money in the interim (and I think people know my views on doing that!), and that was what part of the "second" £500k was going to be required for paying. That was why I presumed they said "within six weeks" for the second £500k.

I pledged in the knowledge of that.

The Season Tickets VAT issue was never raised before (other than by GB, clearly having been briefed with inside information, but unfortunately his attitude and manner is not conducive to gaining credibility IMO). Had I been aware of the issue (it remains an "alleged", I guess) I would have asked for an explanation, and not let it drop - believe me. Ask people what I did about the lease VAT! But - provided the explanation suggested the board had acted in reasonably good faith - I still would have pledged. Since I was pledging (and paid) to try and help save the Bulls, to buy the incumbents time to save the Bulls. The Bulls; not the board.

As per, you make a salient and highly valid point.

What is clear, is the debt level isn't what was expected or in the format it was expected when the initial review was carried out, and that is the real shame. I certainly wouldn't plough money into any business with such ridiculous monthly costs against negligible (and reducing) revenue streams particularly when they are highly likely to reduce further fairly quickly.

The past and how etc is at this stage, slightly immaterial, since brick bats won't solve this. I have my theories on how this may play out and I hope they're proven correct. By the same token, it may very well go the opposite way and the club is no longer. The level of historic debt and HMRC's extremely demanding nature at present, make this one hell of a difficult situation I would imagine.

Adey, zero need for the personal attack, it's futile and somewhat childish given the situation. I'm not concerned as to your perception on my credibility (there is no such thing on a faceless Internet forum), which you pre-determined because I had the audacity to contradict you with fact, especially re the ST vat.

I thoroughly appreciate your passion for the club, but your view of me is absolutely irrelevant given the facts I present. As for the manner, again, that's your jaundiced perception. I may find you patronising and sanctimonious, but pointing that out solves nothing. The caveat being, let's keep it relevant.

Sorry, but totally wrong there.

On Good Friday, the club owed Jan, Feb and March PAYE. Three months. And the liability for April PAYE would arise in a week's time.

This Tuesday, the club owed May and June PAYE. Two months. The liability for July PAYE will arise a fortnight tomorrow.

On Good Friday, the club owed £250k VAT on the Odsal Lease, plus the normal VAT for the first quarter. Due end April. And a bit of VAT for April.

This Tuesday, the club still owed £250k VAT on the OIdsal Lease - but 5 months instalment payments had been agreed in the interim, I suspect after settling the PAYE arrears - and the normal VAT for 2 3/4 of the second quarter.

On both dates, the club owed £250k for tax on image rights going back many years, with payments agreed by three annual instalments.

On both dates, there would appear to have been an outstanding contention with HMRC regarding VAT on season tickets, the exposure for which has been reported as c. £200k.

The o/s tax position is actually somewhat better now than it was. And players have been paid, games have been played and time bought in the interim.

As far as I can tell, the club's financial position is no worse, and should actually be a better, than it was on Good Friday (as a result of the pledge). The administrator has said there is no prepack in place - which surprised and shocked me - so what a bloody good job we did NOT call in the administrators after Easter! At least there has been three months for people to see what they could do.

RFL are indicating its a possibility www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/18609190

RFL are indicating its a possibility www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/18609190

So what did our £400k+ actually pay off then? Just the 4 months' PAYE that was o/s as at Good Friday?
Or did we clear the bank o/d too, on which the previous directors had personal guarantees?

That assumes a new club would be formed immediately out of the ashes doesn't it?

Seems unlikely.

Quote Bullpower2012="Bullpower2012"RFL are indicating its a possibility www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/18609190'" "...under new ownership such as [ia supporters trust[/i." Really?

Quote Bullpower2012="Bullpower2012"RFL are indicating its a possibility www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/18609190'" "...under new ownership such as [ia supporters trust[/i." Really?

No chance. Even with months to prepare I would say it was unlikely.

Quite. I think unlikely is being very generous. Even Bullbuilder is only run by a handful of dedicated volunteers giving what spare time they have, club ownership is several factors more involved. Just can't see it.

I said yesterday:

The Jan and Feb - and then March - PAYE.

Some of the April wages.

Plugging the gap left by the pulled overdraft.

Remember: the club was paying money into the bank account, but the bank would not let the club make payments from it. Therefore the overdraft reduced automatically.

The more I think about it, the more I suspect that the bank became aware that HMRC were probably looking to wind the club up for unpaid PAYE in Mid-March and that may have been the real trigger for them finally pulling the plug.

How would the RFL (or anyone else for that matter) expect a group of fans to run the club until the end of the year. Absolute bonkers.

Let's all give up our jobs, find loads of cash from nowhere to pay the players until the end of the year and while we're at it, lets pick the team by a public vote each week.

Suggest to me the RFL might be considering supporting a temporary vehicle for enabling that to happen? Would make massive sense for them if they did, when you consider the alternative.