Depends what he, or any other purchaser considers a "great deal"
Buying into a business that is loosing £100.000 (AT LEAST) per month is not to my mind a great deal.
The cost of running a dilapidated stadium will increase together with the rent cost to the RFL.

Interesting. Please let it be true.

I don't care who it is to be honest.

According to Mick on twitter, a consortium headed by hood is likely to put forward a.bid before the deadline....

Unfortunately beggars can't be choosers so it doesn't really matter who it is. I hope for your sake someone comes in.

The thing that puzzles me about CC is why he didn't do a pre-pack? That way he could have guaranteed 100% ownership and at a minimal cost. There is no benefit to him waiting to see if someone else want's to bid????

I will freely admit that seeing Hood's name mentioned was a huge surprise to me. I have fully expected him to walk away and leave it to those who ousted him to sort the mess out. If it transpires that he DOES come back with a bid, and provided his proposals include being able to afford the support team and amount of resources that in some fields it seems clear he solely lacked, then he will go up very much in my estimation. And I guess Caisley's victory would be all the more pyrrhic. But it's all rumour only still, and it is not impossible that there might be other agendas at play yet.

End of the day, anyone who can give the club a future in the top flight gets my support. Why would anyone do otherwise?

If Hood feels he has unfinished business and comes forward to save the club, knowing he's already public enemy no 1, then that takes some kahunas!

He obviously feels he was unfairly ousted!

I guess we will really start to see who are real fans of the club!

Do pre-packs still work post Glasgow Rangers?

can hood and caisley have anything to do with a Newco if it comes to that situation?

Yes and yes to both previous questions.

Is there any potential fallout that could rule out Caisley and Hood following the report from the Administrator?

No. The report will be well down the line, and any disqualification action - probably the only risk - would be a long time away yet. Caisley will anyway be in the clear, because he was not a director. Wonder why? And as far as I can see, Hood took all steps he could to minimise loss to the creditors-even if there may be some who will do tHeir utmost to try and show otherwise - so I cannot conceive that he is vulnerable either.

chev walker replied to the comment on twitter and said it was the first he heard of it. Do you think the players will be updated with everything, is it just a rumour?

Potter confirmed investors had come forward but was unsure of what stage talks with the administrators were at on Sky Sports News this morning when they spoke to him

Lets hope so