the notebook was very real, it was your central claim to the information being valid. I remember it clearly not just because it was one of the saddest things Ive ever seen but because the first response after it said "I take it your not the you spilt my beer type of guy"

cant recally who posted that comment but take a bow son. Awesome. You'd struggle to explain how Ive made up such a detailed story from years ago, and clearly at least 2 other posters on here seem to know what Im talking about

NO NOTEBOOK INVOLVED WHATSOEVER.

Which part of that do you not understand?

Your memory is obviously quite limited. After all, you're not even sure which team you support.

Well i know i support my legs because my legs support me ha ha

Cant you take this arguement to the pub in which the notebook was first used ???

As this has now gone completly off topic although is quite funny seeing you two bitch at other

I didn't even comment on this... You can't even remember which teams were involved in the match in question.

Bad memory or just plain lying? Very poor.

Post should be re-edited for accuracy.

RE: Diskin: The officials have too much impact on the game >>>

RE: Fishta called Wanda and the story of the philosophers notebook

I have no problems with understanding your post, Im telling you that you are a liar. You either lied at the time when claiming that you took the notebook to the pub or you are lying now. Either which way at the time you made the claim and was mocked relentlessly for it. I could not have made up a story this preposterous.

naturally you will deny it and i have no interest in keep going around in circles. Id be interested to know if there are any others who remember this little pearler of an occurance.

because the memorable thing wasnt the teams, its fairly obvious.

BUT............ If Adeybull was around to comment he would be dissappointed that you didnt include a pigeon in the new thread title

I did not claim to take a notebook to the pub. I made notes, yes, but there was absolutely no notebook involved. So I am not lying.



Apart from the word "relentlessly", close.





Except it's critical to your story. You claimed I made notes to prove Saints got away with a lot. Now you claim it doesn't matter who was involved in the match. Seeing as Saints weren't involved in the match, how was it supposed to prove Saints get away with a lot? It really just proves you are a big liar.

So my post was not "literally" a series of unpunished offences by Saints players, because Saints weren't even PLAYING.

There's a very memorable moment in the match that may jog your memory. Brian Carney claiming "Oi've never thrown a swinging arm in moi loife!"

ok then it wasnt saints it was a crib list of anti wigan evidence./ So what, the story is clearly based on a real occurance hence your recollection of the events. Your just splitting hairs now with the whole notes / notebook. The simple fact is it was incredibly sad to make notes about a match to then use it as evidence for an internet forum argument. That was the critical point, not who was playing and what device you recorded your info on

It isnt. It is peripheral information. The only thing that matters is if you made notes on a match because that is what you were mocked for. The who's, whats, wheres and whys are irrelevant.

Gentlemen.

This has been a beautiful romance, but I fear it's run it's course for the rest of us. As thrilling as the story of the Pub Notebook is, I'm over it.

Either have a playground scrap elsewhere, get a room and enjoy your man love or for the love of Jesus and Mary Chain, turn it in.