Ah right, let's advocate headbutting, nice.

I'm confused now. So did he land on his back or his elbow? So was it a good tackle or one that needed penalising? Did he lift the legs or not?
I think you need to focus on one thing and try and stick to it. It might make life easier for you.
Headbutting should be penalised, as should dangerous tackles. Stamp out the latter and the former will be minimised.

He didn't headbutt. Think you'll find that having tried to break his fall with his elbow he then landed on his back and was bounced off the ground by such a good tackle that he then richochetted back up and clashed heads with Seymour.

Yeah, ok, that's exactly what happened.

Obviously I need to explain the difference between fact and opinion.

I said "It's a penalty by the letter of the law" - Fact

I then said "it's a great tackle that shouldn't be penalised (as it isn't in the NRL)" - Opinion.

He landed flat on his back after attempting to break his fall with his elbow (assuming that he was trying to get his hand down, but didn't do it in time). It's not a difficult concept to grasp.

Your back-peddling is getting embarassing now. I think you need to get over it now and move on, you are getting obsessed.

Ah, the 'I can't answer it, so I'll try to make out he's obsessed' line. Too funny.

Are you still here? You not got any songs to sing about Hull KR or anything tonight? You really are obsessed.

What would you like me to answer? I didn't see any questions.

^ = Owned.

I think they're missing you on the Hull KR boards... Do us all a favour and post your crap elsewhere.

Wow you really are an aggressive one, I must have really got under your skin whilst pointing out everything you had said was incorrect.

Feel free to stop by and embarrass yourself any time.