Just seen T&A. Looks like that rat Caisley has got his way, Hood & Bennett off and club heading for Administration for Caisley to own. Words cannot describe my feelings

Quote: staffbull1973 "Just seen T&A. Looks like that rat Caisley has got his way, Hood & Bennett off and club heading for Administration for Caisley to own. Words cannot describe my feelings'" www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... on=success

Quote: staffbull1973 "Just seen T&A. Looks like that rat Caisley has got his way, Hood & Bennett off and club heading for Administration for Caisley to own. Words cannot describe my feelings'" www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... on=success

If he takes us into administration to get 100% ownership and pours all that money down the drain his name will be dirtier than mud.

Doesn't say anywhere Caisleys taking us into Administration. While i am disappointed Caisley is taking the club over, it looks like the Bulls couldn't find alternative investment. Which means administration and losing Bateman, Whitehead Lulia etc for peanuts. I would rather have Caisley in charge

Looks like we're in for an interesting week..

I just hope Mr Caisley now has a plan to take this club forward. Perhaps holding his hands up and accepting some responsiblity for this mess would be a start.

This is the right decision. Both men have tried their hardest for the club and should be thanked for their efforts.

Perhaps its the ongoing game of bluff and counterbluff? Perhaps Peter Hood has done this to nudge a possible Investor to commit and also put the spotlight on Caisley to also put his money(other investors) where his mouth is!

Getting that sinking feeling...

I have much more confidence in Hood and Bennett guiding us out of this mess than Caisley, I am truly gutted for doth Hood and Bennett. Have a feeling Caisley is just going to go in assess the damage decide nothing can be done and pop us into administration, can't see him fighting for the bulls to stay out of admin like Hood and Bennett would have.

Hope I'm proven wrong, I really do.

Agree 100%. Perhaps Staffbull can give us some insight into his comments? If they are groundless perhaps he can consider the impact upon supporters to what he is saying?

I presume on the basis that he can find some funds?

He has not put anything specific on the table, don't forget - just a plan to come up with a plan. We probably don't have time for that, so you'd better pray he can bring some funds, and qucikly, else its administration regardless.

We can all list several people people who have a greater need to justify their words and actions and the impact they had on supporters.

I will eat my words if there is a big investor being brought in by Caisley. Cos if that were the case he could have done that at ANY time over the last 6 years, but hasn't. Dont tell me he hasn't known about the finances over this period of time.....only time will tell........

Interesting final programme statement from Hood.

The best bit is "When we publish the list of those who have pledged there will be a number of high profile people who profess their love for the club which are conspicuous by their absence"

I wonder who hasn't pledged ....

Isn't Hood's statement also an admission that he's drawn a blank on the investment front?

I think we're all in for one last surprise!

BTW had a good chat with Nobby as he walked in to the game, really positive and can't wait to get started. Very excited about working with the likes of Bateman and Whitehead et al!

I keep asking this, but given the intervention of Caisley, and the fact that the people who are trying to do the deals are the same people that are going to be voted off -is there actually any investor that is going to do a deal with a bunch of dead men walking? Or am I missing something?

To my simplistic brain. calling the EGM and announcing that Hood & Co would be voted off, must have killed any pre-EGM investment stone dead. I mean, why would anyone put a large sum of money into a club which may be in administration in a couple of weeks?

The only alternative possibility would be Hood attending teh EGM and presenting his investor and his plan, and persuading the meeting to NOT vote him off.

Either way, leaving aside an unlikely deal between the factions, I find it impossible to see how anything could now happen pre-EGM. Can anyone explain a flaw in my logic?