I've had a call from the club reicon_surprised.gifur sponsorship.

Obviously Tom B is now somewhat of a first team regular and is attracting other sponsorship offers.

His price has also gone up to £650.

I'm of the view we let someone else sponsor him and focus our funding to the "less attractive" youngsters

Does anyone have any huge disagreement with this viewpoint?

seems fair enough to me. Are we going to keep sponsoring o'brien and bateman and add another to replace tom?.

Thought it was Southernwood.

might well have been. can remember we had three, pretty certain burgess and bateman were two of them.

Thought it was Tom, John and Cain.

your correct, just been and checked the sticky thread. your probably most up to date with academy - any suggestions as to whos likely to break through in next year or two?. Rob hawthorne seems to have been mentioned a bit IIRC.

We always said we would try sponsor those juniors in the squad that probably wouldn't attract any sponsorship.

I'm happy to sponsor a few lads unlikely to get many games.

are we limiting it to 1st team squad?

Bullseye fits the criteria but he is getting on a bit now.

Count me in again.

Me too x2 again

I'm happy to go with youngsters again.

Hopefully we played our part in Tom's rise

I'm happy to sponsor any of the kids as per the last two years.

Happy to go with whoever. Has Bateman's price not gone up too? He has had a few first team games.

Yup,
I think we should continue to sponsor the kids - Tom will have no problem getting sponsorship next season. Count the Cookie clan in