Back by popular demand - thanks FA

Please comment on your choice!

I go for the first option (should have gone before start of this season). The club were going in the wrong direction before this season and he's only made it worse barring a few false dawns

Where are all the "happy in varying degrees from mildly to ecstatic" options?

Not making the play offs is NOT acceptable in my opinion. But we are not going to sack him. So no point in voting.

I vote for some changes in back room staff, some more quality signings and some openess from the board.

Give him 5 or 6 games into the new season and if it looks like we are heading for another mediocre season then sack.

Mac's an uber-hunk, if a tad cuddly these days, but he's still got muscles on muscles girls- trust me on this. And have you [iseen[/i those [ilips[/i?

Agent McNamara must get a new contract, sure, we did have to finish the job off vs catalans but he did great, who else couldve done it better?

On that basis Richard Agar would be England coach.

I dont follow.

Sunday March 15
Super League
Bradford (12) 24 Hull (22) 36
Tries: Sheriffe, Menzies, Jeffries, Tadulala Thorman, Hall 2, Yeaman 2, R Horne
Goals: Deacon 4 Tickle 6
Attend: 11,327

Friday March 6
Super League
Huddersfield (10) 20 Hull (1icon_cool.gif 24
Tries: Walsh, Brown, B Hodgson, D Hodgson Thackray, Briscoe, Yeaman, R Horne
Goals: B Hodgson 2 Tickle 4
Attend: 10,459

Friday February 27
Super League
Hull (14) 28 Catalans Dragons (0) 12
Tries: Briscoe, Hall, R Horne, Berrigan Elima, Mogg
Goals: Tickle 6 Bosc 2
Attend: 12,482

Saturday February 21
Super League
Celtic Crusaders (10) 20 Hull (1icon_cool.gif 28
Tries: Quinn, Chalk 2, Duggan Tickle 3, Berrigan, Calderwood
Goals: Hannay 2 Tickle 4
Attend: 5,272

Friday February 13
Super League
Hull (6) 18 Wigan (6) 10
Tries: Radford, Cusack, R Horne Richards, Bailey
Goals: Tickle 3 Richards
Attend: 4,573

5 points from the opening 10 games should have seen him being shown the door.

I see 15 people have voted that he's doing a good enough job or should be given another contract yet no one has explained these opinions on the thread. I can only assume these are 5th column supporters of other teams or people making fun for the sake of it.

If not I'd be interested in reading from any Bulls fan why he should see out his contract or be given a new one? Its only a messageboard don't be scared!

I cannot beleive that our own fans are prepared to accept the sub mediocrity that his team served up this season. Beating a few lower table clubs at the end of the season changes nothing.

But there's 9 (only) "sack" votes yet "only" two have said why. You could say the same about the rest. Unfortunately for you it is not compulsory for folk to say either now they vote, much less why they vote as they do. Indeed this follows most democratic processes where ballots are entirely secret.

Your assumption is uncalled for and totally invalid. It just suits you to pretend that.

Don't talk wet. I've seen others jump to the wrong conclusion about the identity of posters on this board, don't see how this is any different

I don't expect everyone to explain their choice - just one or two would be nice considering the proportion of votes and no explanation. Whats wrong with asking a few so far anonymous people to explain their views?

As for the people in the sack camp - we've had plenty of opinion on this so far it is pretty obvious why they've voted so given how the team has been in 2009

I'll talk exactly as I like, but the damp verbiage is coming from your direction.


Nothing at all. If you had. And if you respect their perfect right not to tell you how they vote, or why. THIS is the dodgy bit I can only assume these are 5th column supporters of other teams or people making fun for the sake of it. '"