Inspired by Sandra the Terrorist's crazy competition on the HKR board, I wonder if the assembled RABbies (or indeed valued guests) fancy doing something similar?

All I want is at least 2 teams of 5, self-picked teams are fine, or individuals who want to play and I will form them into teams.

The general idea will be that each round you get to a challenge of something pointless, stupid, annoying or pathetic and then marks are awarded, by guest judges where possible, until one team wins the Final. Some players being eliminated along the way.

Hopefully I can make it as anarchic and shambolic as Sandra does, respect although I plan to be more ruthless.

Or, nothing at all may happen due to general apathy.

Entries please

I will give it ago

I have no idea what you are talking about, but go on then I'll have a go.

Ditto... go on, i'll give it a go.

I'm in, but as all my points are succinct & cutting edge I might struggle. Otherwise I haven't a clue what you are on about FA.

Well, that's enough for one team. At this rate, it should be a close but boring comp.

Are ginners allowed?

Ill give it a go

Its hard to put your hand up to take part when you don't have a clue what the hell FA is talking about.

Noone has had a clue what FA has been talking about for years, let's be honest...

Well that's a half hour of my life, or dinner time, that I won't get back. I've read 17 pages of the HKR board & can clear up a couple of things:
1. I'm still none the wiser.
2. FA caused chaos on there as well.

Well volunteered, that's nearly a second team, two teams is enough so just a couple more and we're away with Round 1

This takes me back to the days of the old Bulls message board and the sort of nonsense that went on there. I'll give it a go.

Right, well, as it looks like we probably have a competition, more details.

Have a gander at thishttp://tinyurl.com/RABcomprl

As the comp goes on, I will be putting the running scores into a spreadsheet. So that you can see a typical example of how it might work, I've at the moment put 2 specimen teams in the spreadsheet, and I have given each player random scores for each round, but the real points will be awarded for each player by whoever is the guest judge for that round. There's a few nils, based on the assumption that not every player will be arrsed to play in every round.

As you can see, in the worked example, Team A narrowly won the Final.

Rules
Each team must appoint a captain.
Each entry can receive up to the max points for that round
Any player not making an entry by the deadline gets 0 pts
Any team where ALL members post an entry gets one additional MP bonus
If neither team posts a full set, the team posting most entries gets the MP bonus
At the end of R3 and again at end of R4, each teams cumulative score is halved. Because it just is.
At end of R4 and R5 - the player in each team with least points is eliminated (their scores to date still count for team total)
Eliminations- In the event of a tie, captain will eliminate one player, failing which the organiser will toss a coin and announce the casualty.
Final - In the event of a tie, captains will be asked to do a play off task.