Yet another dig at someone. When exactly is some action going to be taken against you? After all, people get a ban for namecalling you so unless you are seen to have sanctions against you it is clearly a joke of a system if certain posters get a free reign to say what they like but a ban heads in the way of anyone who retaliates.

Not suggesting you are friendly with the mods or anything.....

Infamy, infamy...

Maybe if you just put a stop to it rather than let it go on then people would stop getting so annoyed. In the last week he has openly abused myself, RTB and Roger Dailly yet gets off scot-free. Does he not have to stick to the AUP like everyone else? If he does can we assume he will be taking a break sometime soon. Roger Dailly is doing exactly that, for less of an offence. Can you explain to us all why this is?

Out of order but, as I said on another thread, you do not want to upset Adey do you? Still, people can see it.

To be fair tho Adeybull had a point, the guy comes on having to put a downer on the news of Luke Gale instead of trying to looks at the positives, which i believe is the case in most his posts, never seems to have anything productive to say

Adey had a mild dig at someone based on his Eeyoreish response to Gale's signing. No one notices, apart from Eddie who thinks this is a banning issue. What to do, what to do...

Adey is a Tory who smells of wee. And he has never abused me.

Rohypnol....

What he actually posted was

Now, in context, and as I think any reasonable person can agree, this is mild ribbing of the OP for being a glass-half-empty kind of guy. And indeed the OP doesn't seem to be happy with much that goes on at the Bulls.

Which viewpoint he is, I hasten to add for ME's sake so as to avoid the risk of being accused of attempted murder, perfectly entitled to have.

Now to me, gently pointing out in a civilised way that someone is continually posting from the negative angles, is a perfectly acceptable thing to do. And since i am (mercifully) not a mod, it is no business of mine whether that is allowed on RAB, but I would think (and hop) that the mods view is there is nothing wrong with it. It's just well within the bounds of normal conversation.

People will always disagree. But to try to dress this particular post up as a "personal attack" is just bullcrap IMHO.

But, if it is, then it is no more than ME's constant digs at a mythical hierarchy, clique, call it what he will. I get sick of him chiming in with these snipes all over the place, it does try to derail threads and turn them into tirades about what seems to be some major chip ME has as to a number of posters ("the hierarchy", today, ffs).

I am very happy to leave it to the mods as to how far ME's derailing is permitted, which is just as well since it is fsck-all to do with me, and it is very easy to just ignore posts you don't like, but I would just comment that in this case, I think Adey's remark about the disparaging reaction of the OP to the signing, seen in the context of his general disparaging tone to much of what the Bulls do, is fair comment and is a seven-day camel ride short of a "personal attack". If we can't mildly rebuke people in this way, then we may as well shut the forum.

And it is certainly no worse than ME's fake allegations about hierarchies, and not thread deflecting. Whereas ME's launching into full-on attack-the-biased-and-sooooo-unfair modding is, as well as being a deliberate flouting of the rules about public criticism of the modding process. When we sign Luke Gale, I don't want to read how badly ME, or anyone, thinks the forum is modded in that thread, which should be about Luke Gale and whether he is a positive, negative or neutral acquisition for the Bulls.

Tigertot ate my hamster.

How can anyone defend the dribble 'roger daily' plasted on this forum this week is beyond me! Cannot be compared imo...

Last season 'rupert bear' was banned for trolling for the crime of questioning the official attendance given out for the Catalans game. Can't see how he can be a troll and a season ticket holder as well!
Bring back rupert bear, he has served his time!

If only I knew where it had been immediately prior.

It had been in a clearing in the woods, taking a dump, when the biggest grizzly in the woods came up next to it, and squatting down, did the vilest smelling pile of poo in history. Then noticed the hamster.

Quaking, the hamster said, Good day to you, Mr Bear"

The bear says "Hi there, hamster. This shiiting in the woods is no good, don't you find the shiit sticks to your fur?

"No, not really", says the hamster

The bear says, "Oh , well that's handy", picks up the hamster and wipes

hamster in nut marinade?

Why has he not had a pop at Aaronbull for saying the same thing then?

As for the comments. It is now practically every thread that he has to have a pop at somebody because they do not fit in with his opinions. I, for one, am sick of his snidey wee digs at me that he seems to get away with all the time despite apparently having been warned about them by the mods in the past.

Roger Daily called someone (Adey I guess) a "bumhead" yet copped a ban for it yet this guy is allowed to slag off everyone he wants without any retribution whatsoever? How does that work? The amount of times he sees fit to mock my mental issues when he full well knows I suffer from depression is ridiculous and seriously lacking in class.

Who is next to disagree with him and face the wrath of this self appointed board police?

As I said earlier and will say so again, Adey can say what he likes without worry because he is friends with at three of the moderating team who do not care what he says whatsoever as they will not upset one of their mates.

One off comments perhaps do not warrant a ban but a constant need to keep making the same digs after allegedly getting a warning to quit it surely is.

But it won't happen.

because aaronbull isn't negative as muchas you simples.

roger was abusive to numerous members of the forum, not just the bumhead quote,

adey is probably one of if not the most respected person on this forum, most get along but why do you bring it up to be abuse? It certainly isn't worthy of a banning. And not hint of abuse it's just stating what you must be in response to always bringing a downer on things, voicing your opinion is one thing but you take the mick sometimes mate, please just stop being negative all the time