Diskin obviously thinks not. I think Saints player played for it but stupid from Lynch to turn into it. Well played Bulls however.

lynch lost us a point there...simple as

Obvious obstruction. I'm sure ritz will agree.

There was just no need for it either, you had the game won.

I think lynch was an idiot to do that. Penalty for sure. And it was a nothing kick. Kearney had it wrapped up.

Definate penalty!

Shame aswell, was about to congratulate you on a good win. Some big hits in that game from both teams

Deffo a Pen.

If it would of been st's that did that to us and it wouldnt of been given there would of been hell on. Simples

Obvious obstruction

I'd have loved for you to beat them but he lost you the game

It was a clear penalty. It was quite a relief to get it after his steadfast refusal to not give Saints a penalty whilst on your line in the last ten minutes. There were several opportunities for him to do it, the one where Elima pushed Wilkin back was borderline ridiculous.

Yep it was, a bit brainless from Lynch!

Diskin might get into trouble with.his comments, and he was wrong. Deffo penalty. Great game. Fair result.

Dubious penalty. Which ever way it would have been given would have left somebody upset.

There were many worse challenges unpunished in the match.

Dubious??? A deffo clear cut penalty, Lynch moved across and put shoulder in..no need to do it as we had cover there..can shoulder charge if running in same direction and dont purposefully move across to do it, but Lynch did..absolutely stupid and should apologise to rest of players.

I thought it was as blatant a shoulder on the kicker as you could get. It was seconds after the ball had left, absolutely idiotic as he didn't need to do it.

It was a poor kick which we had covered and he could have easily gotten away with it if he just ran without looking at the man. Lynch lined him up and moved in with the shoulder. I still belive that any contact and it would have ended up a penalty. Hope RFL don't charge Diskin for his comments however

Penalty for sure.

It's one thing to run along side a player and challenge for the ball, quite another to step across a player and shoulder barge without chasing for the ball.

The only dubious thing is why?

The fullback was quite capable of covering.

Funny how a penalty in the last second is controversial when the 2 no tries are suddenly not critical at all.