The RFL technically got the lease for nothing. They essentially took it because they had been down right moronic to lend Hood all that money under the table which he couldn't pay back. So they took the lease, all bad decisions effecting the club can be traced back to the RFL sticky fingers in 2010 and that loan and ultimately the 14 years which have followed.
Yeah should've allowed us to go into admin with the lease included in the assets. We might have attracted a better owner than Omar Khan and everything may have been different. Sliding doors eh?
[quote="Bullseye":1j66os52]Yeah should've allowed us to go into admin with the lease included in the assets. We might have attracted a better owner than Omar Khan and everything may have been different. Sliding doors eh?[/quote:1j66os52]Yeah losing the lease is the reason the RBS stated influenced the decision to remove all overdraft facilities.
[quote="redeverready":2h4ch0mw]Yeah losing the lease is the reason the RBS stated influenced the decision to remove all overdraft facilities.[/quote:2h4ch0mw]
As should've been obvious was going to happen - went over the heads of RFL/Hood.
Are all the smaller improvement projects now complete?
How are they looking in the flesh?
Is anything else on the cards in the way of more ground upgrades?
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
