Quote: HAPEtobehere "What’s the alternative? Hate to say it but if we all take a Spartacus stand against the club and prove a point the result is the club ceases to exist. There’s zero chance wood and Duffy aren’t up to something and there’s secret agendas all over the place but this is my club and there’s no alternative for the sport and club I love. I didn’t want to support another consortium but that’s what’s there if I want to support the club And sport I’ve dedicated my life to I have to support the consortium that’s there now.
Suppose we can all sit back and say I told you so but we’ve all done that in previous admins and we’re all still here, but what I won’t accept is a group of people intentionally trying to agitate whilst the community around this club suffers. The sale has happened and if they want to be involved then they should get their substantial imaginary wallet out and put a bid in to the creditors when it bleeding mattered 2 weeks ago. Rant over, I knew I shouldn’t have risen to the eggs but this inflation of the debts doesn’t help anyone until it can be confirmed. Solid facts or nowt'"
But Hape, you could rewind your I'm "here for the new owners" quote back two years and apply it to Chalmers. Or further back to Green. Both of those have shown themselves to be unfit owners of the club. I posted some of questions on FA's "Goodnight Irene" thread. If you can answer any of them satisfactorily, I'd be surprised. Personally I will support a Bulls Club as small as it needs be that is owned and run by trustworthy people who have the club and the city of Bradford at it's heart. There is nothing in the current consortium and the way it has been carved up with the many unanswered questions behind them that gives me confidence to believe they are the owners I want. So I won't be "here for them" until they have demonstrated they are fit and proper owners. Best wishes to you.
[/color:p889vjdy]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_54039.jpg
