Not necessarily. There's no rule that says loan players can't play against their parent clubs. It's purely down to whatever the two clubs agree between them when the loan happens.

Just throwing a few names about.. I was trying to avoid mentioning Rangi Chase!

Didn't know that Iestyn Harris was an agent. Hope he's got a better understanding of the small print of contracts these days

It’s just lie after lie from the club, it was said he was injured, now he says he has been fit for the last few weeks, when lies start it’s often got a bad bullet on it’s way

No they haven't. Dane himself was the one who said he was injured and would be out for around a couple of weeks. He then came back in a reserves game a couple of weeks a go(hence him being fit)

Having an off-the-cuff style doesn't automatically mean you can't thrive in a structured environment. Robbie Paul in his pomp was an unpredictable genius, but he could also knuckle down and play the game in front of him. It doesn't have to crush your natural creativity.

If as a player you are such a one trick pony that you can't accommodate a request to play in a certain style, then perhaps you are better buggering off.

Quick update for everyone who’s asked,Hopefully back playing in 2-3 weeks.i have a full-thickness cartilage defect in my lateral femoral condyle.Basically have a dint in my bone & some small cartilage damage.nothing serious,just frustrating,I wanna play footy! Be back ASAP. This was from Danes Twitter a month ago

Jk said Dane was a couple of weeks away, you believe what ever you like, I believe it’s lie after lie, who signed Jon margin, because they obviously didn’t do there homework on him, too many questions to ask, but no point as you never get the truth back, no one from the club makes comments, read what Dane has said, your not blind the truth is in there or can’t you read

You are right the truth is there DC says JK does not want Dane Chisholm. End of story. The club won`t reveal reasons, maybe because no other club would touch him with a bargepole if they did.

And we got rid of the lad to Huddersfield because ????
And we shipped Magrin out because ????
Next we will be signing that Scottish half back scotch mist

What point are you trying to make here. You appear to mistrust the motives of our owners but is there a conspiracy theory you want so share?