Quote: Bullseye "Adey's thoughts on TotalRL.com here
pps. makes you wonder if somewhere, between Bulls 4.0 and Bulls 5.0, the RFL effectively became the employer for a short period? Again, maybe in substance iof not in legal form? Had not thought of that before, but could be a very strong reason why the RFL would be enjoined in the action? The thick plottens...
[/i'"
In regards to this, if I remember correctly wasn't there a new 'Bradford Northern' announced with ALL the players TUPEd over? They announced it before getting RFL permission. I vaguely remember looking at their initial website....
This was, of course, until the RFL decided that they were not the preferred owners and euthanised it.
However, if the players were TUPEd over, and then the RFL killed that off wouldn't the RFL have a responsibility to these players, as they have technically made them redundant once again?